Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Contract Labour Services by ONGC — Violation of Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour (R&A) Act. Termination of services of contract labour without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and without obtaining requisite permission under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 held illegal.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners were contract labourers engaged by the respondent ONGC through various contractors. Their services were terminated without any notice or compensation. The petitioners challenged the termination as illegal and violative of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970. The court examined the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, which requires notice or compensation before termination of a workman who has been in continuous service for at least one year. The court also considered the applicability of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 to the engagement of contract labour by ONGC. The court held that the termination was illegal as it did not comply with the mandatory requirements of Section 25-F and the Contract Labour Act. The court further held that the termination amounted to an unfair labour practice. The court allowed the writ petitions and directed the reinstatement of the petitioners with continuity of service and back wages.

Headnote

A) Industrial Law - Termination of Services - Contract Labour - Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Termination of contract labour without notice or compensation is illegal - The court held that the termination of the petitioners' services by ONGC through its contractor without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and violative of the principles of natural justice (Paras 10-15).

B) Industrial Law - Contract Labour - Applicability of Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - The court held that the provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 apply to the engagement of contract labour by ONGC, and the termination without permission is invalid (Paras 16-20).

C) Industrial Law - Unfair Labour Practice - The court held that the termination of services without following due process amounts to an unfair labour practice under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Paras 21-25).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of services of the petitioners by the respondent ONGC through its contractor without following the procedure under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and without obtaining permission under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is legal and valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petitions allowed. Termination held illegal. Petitioners entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Law Points

  • Termination of contract labour without notice or compensation violates Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act
  • 1947
  • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act
  • 1970 applies
  • Principle of natural justice
  • Unfair labour practice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 134

WRIT PETITION NO. 2443 OF 2022, WRIT PETITION NO. 2355 OF 2021, WRIT PETITION NO. 1724 OF 2021

2023-08-23

2023:BHC-OS:8840

Suryakand D. Lad and others

M/s. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging termination of contract labour services by ONGC.

Remedy Sought

Reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages.

Filing Reason

Termination of services without notice or compensation and without following statutory procedure.

Issues

Whether termination of contract labour without complying with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act is illegal. Whether Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act applies to the engagement. Whether termination amounts to unfair labour practice.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that termination without notice or compensation violates Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour Act. Respondents argued that petitioners were contract labour and not direct employees, hence no violation.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of contract labour without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and without permission under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 is illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice.

Judgment Excerpts

The termination of the petitioners' services without complying with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal. The provisions of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 apply to the engagement of contract labour by ONGC.

Acts & Sections

  • Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: Section 25-F
  • Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Bar Association Election Dispute. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Application Rejected as Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Was Not Barred by Law.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Contract Labour Services by ONGC — Violation of Industrial Disputes Act and Contract Labour (R&A) Act. Termination of services of contract labour without compliance with Section 25-...