High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging the Constitutionality of Maharashtra Act IX of 2017. Petitioners Contend that Multi-Member Wards and Direct Election of President Violate Article 243R and Equality Clauses.
28 Sep 2018...
Search Results for "distinct proceedings"
3437 result(s) found
Found 3437 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Applicability of Maharashtra Fee Regulation Act to Autonomous Professional Colleges. The Court Examined Whether Autonomous Status Under the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 Exempts Institutions from Fee Oversight by the Fees Regulating Authority.
25 Jan 2018The judgment addressed a common question of law arising from three writ petitions filed by autonomous educational institutions: K.J. Somaiya College o...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Award of Composite Works Contract to MSE Bidder, Holds Public Procurement Policy Inapplicable to Works Contracts. Composite Tender for Firefighting System Involving Design, Supply, and Erection is a Works Contract Not Covered Under Section 11 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.
25 Jul 2017The dispute arose from a tender floated by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL), a public sector undertaking, for a comprehensive firefi...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Preliminary Objection on Locus Standi, Holds That Non-Production of Degree Certificates Does Not Defeat Public Interest Challenge to Bank's Campus Recruitment Policy; Relies on D.C. Wadhwa. Members of the public may challenge executive recruitment practices as unconstitutional under Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution, without having to prove personal eligibility at the threshold.
1 Apr 2013The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by four individuals challenging the recruitment policy of Central Bank of I...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.
12 Mar 2019The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Writ Petition No. 3280 of 2024 — Application Under Section 319 CrPC to Summon Witnesses for Extortion Not Triable Together with Rape Offences
30 Jun 2025The matter originated from an FIR lodged on 28 January 2014 by the complainant alleging rape and other offences against the petitioners under Sections...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Purchaser's Originating Summons in Property Agreement Dispute; Holds Payment of Consideration Not Conditional on Vendor's Covenants. Default in Payment Triggered Acceleration Clause Under Clause 1(i) of Agreement, Making Entire Balance Payable and Vendor's Termination Valid.
29 Mar 2012The dispute arose from an agreement dated 13 June 1978 whereby the defendant vendor agreed to sell a plot of land at Santacruz to the plaintiff builde...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Filed by Sugar Factories and Distilleries Against State of Maharashtra Regarding Excise Transport Fees. Petitioners Challenged Validity of Transport Fee Demands Under Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.
1 Jan 1970The Bombay High Court, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, adjudicated a batch of fifty-one writ petitions filed by various sugar factori...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition to Stay Nullity Proceedings in Family Court — Stay of Civil Proceedings Not Automatic Despite Pending Criminal Case. The court held that mere embarrassment is not sufficient to stay civil proceedings; the petitioner must show serious prejudice.
14 Dec 2017The petitioner-husband filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Family Court, Pune dated 4 June 2016, which rejected his application under S...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Petition for Foreign Award Citing Lack of Jurisdiction Due to Prior Section 34 Filing. Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Vests Exclusive Jurisdiction with the Court at Jamkhambalia Where the Section 34 Application Was First Filed.
20 Dec 2010The petitioners, Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd., a company incorporated in England engaged in shipping, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitration award...
- 13
