Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Appeal under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. Appeal involves multiple interim applications and stakeholders including developers and financial institutions.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Government Company"
7105 result(s) found
Found 7105 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.
4 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...
- 190
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
6 Jun 2022The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PF Damages and Interest Due to Non-Functioning of Appellate Tribunal — Directs Reconsideration of Damages Under Section 14-B of EPF Act. The court held that damages under Section 14-B are not automatic and require consideration of mitigating circumstances, and interest under Section 7-Q is compensatory but can be modulated.
2 Aug 2006The petitioners, Cable Corporation of India Ltd. and another, challenged an order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner directing them to...
- 125
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Company in CBI Case — Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Alone Without Its Directors for Criminal Offences. The Court held that a company, being a juristic person, can only act through its directors or officers; therefore, prosecution of a company without impleading its directors is not maintainable.
15 Feb 2019The petitioner, Sanofi India Limited (formerly Aventis Pharma Limited), a public limited company, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Cr...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Disabled Employee Against Private Company for Violation of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. Employer Directed to Re-Employ or Pay Compensation for Hearing Loss Acquired Due to Unsafe Work Environment.
23 Dec 2005The petitioner, Shree Satish Prabhakar Padhye, a person with hearing disability, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...
- 84
High Court
- 60
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.
16 Aug 2019Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...
- 62
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.
3 Mar 2025The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...
- 661
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Prosecution Against Directors in Food Adulteration Case Due to Inordinate Delay Depriving Right to Reanalysis. Delay of 35 months in filing complaint violated Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, rendering trial futile.
23 Sep 2024The applicants, who were directors of M/s. Bunge Agri Business India Ltd., filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...
- 453
