High Court of Karnataka Quashes Proceedings Against Company in CBI Case — Company Cannot Be Prosecuted Alone Without Its Directors for Criminal Offences. The Court held that a company, being a juristic person, can only act through its directors or officers; therefore, prosecution of a company without impleading its directors is not maintainable.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sanofi India Limited (formerly Aventis Pharma Limited), a public limited company, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru (CCH-47). The case arose from a CBI investigation into alleged criminal offences. The company was arraigned as an accused, but no directors or officers were impleaded. The core legal issue was whether a company alone can be prosecuted for criminal offences without its directors. The petitioner argued that a company, being a juristic person, cannot act on its own and requires natural persons to be held vicariously liable. The respondent-CBI contended that a company can be prosecuted independently. The Court, after hearing arguments, held that a company can only act through its directors or officers, and prosecuting the company alone would be an empty formality. The Court quashed the entire proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017, including the impugned order dated 01.06.2017.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Prosecution of Company - Vicarious Liability - Section 482 Cr.P.C. - The question was whether a company can be prosecuted alone without its directors for criminal offences. The Court held that a company, being a juristic person, can only act through its directors or officers; therefore, prosecution of a company without impleading its directors is not maintainable as it would be an empty formality. The proceedings were quashed. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a Company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The entire proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru (CCH-47) are quashed.

Law Points

  • Criminal liability of company
  • vicarious liability
  • prosecution without natural persons
  • Section 482 Cr.P.C.
  • quashing of proceedings
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 103

Criminal Petition No. 4280/2018

2019-02-15

P.S. Dinesh Kumar

Shri Uday Holla (Senior Advocate for petitioner), Shri P. Prasanna Kumar (Standing Counsel for respondent-CBI)

Sanofi India Limited (formerly Aventis Pharma Limited)

State represented by Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti-Corruption Branch, Bengaluru

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings in a CBI case against a company.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of entire proceedings in Special C.C. No. 226/2017 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru (CCH-47), including the impugned order dated 01.06.2017.

Filing Reason

The company was prosecuted alone without its directors for criminal offences, which the petitioner argued is not maintainable.

Issues

Whether a Company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that a company, being a juristic person, cannot be prosecuted alone without its directors or officers. Respondent-CBI argued that a company can be prosecuted independently.

Ratio Decidendi

A company, being a juristic person, can only act through its directors or officers. Prosecution of a company without impleading its directors is not maintainable as it would be an empty formality.

Judgment Excerpts

The question for consideration in this petition is, ‘whether a Company alone can be prosecuted for commission of criminal offences without its directors?’ Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioner is a Public Limited Company. The CBI has filed a charge sheet against the petitioner alone without impleading any of its directors or officers.

Procedural History

The CBI filed a charge sheet against the petitioner company alone. The petitioner filed this criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the proceedings. The petition was heard and reserved for orders on 13.11.2018, and the order was pronounced on 15.02.2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Prevention of Food Adulteration Act Case. Section 20A Permits Magistrate to Implead Manufacturer, Distributor or Dealer During Trial Even if Accused Is Dealer, Overriding Section 319(3) CrPC.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the...