
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 246, Article 248, Entry 62 List II – Finance Act, 1994 – Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 – The Supreme Court held that lotteries fall under betting and gambling, a subject matter reserved for State legislatures under Entry 62 of List II, thus rendering the imposition of service tax on lottery distributors by the Union Parliament unconstitutional.
Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that service tax on lottery distributors is unconstitutional, affirming that lottery taxation is within State jurisdiction.
Nature of the Litigation: Petition filed by the Union of India challenging High Court judgments that struck down service tax on lottery distributors as unconstitutional.
Remedy Sought: Union of India sought reinstatement of service tax provisions on lottery distributors under the Finance Act, 1994.
Reason for Filing the Case: The Union aimed to overturn the High Court's verdict which invalidated service tax on lottery transactions.
Decisions Until Now: High Court ruled against service tax imposition on lotteries, citing lack of legislative competence.
Issues: a) Whether service tax imposed on lottery distributors is unconstitutional? b) Whether the relationship between the State and lottery distributors is of principal-to-principal or principal-agent?
Submissions/Arguments: Union of India: Argued that lottery distributors act as agents of the State, and thus service tax applies. [Paras 7a-7h] Respondents: Contended that the relationship is principal-to-principal, and lotteries are actionable claims, not services.
Ratio Decidendi: Lotteries being actionable claims fall under betting and gambling, exclusively taxed by State legislatures under Entry 62, List II. Amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 imposing service tax on lotteries were struck down as ultra vires.
Subjects: Service Tax – Lottery Distributors – Actionable Claims – Betting – Gambling – State Legislature – Finance Act – Constitutional Validity – Principal-to-Principal Relationship – Residuary Powers
Case Title: UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS VERSUS FUTURE GAMING SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER ETC.
Citation: 2025 LawText (SC) (2) 1101
Case Number: CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4289-4290 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9506-9507 OF 2013 CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2172-2173 OF 2016 CIVIL APPEAL NO.16118 OF 2017 CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.18565 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.30629 of 2014) CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.14111 of 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.19200 of 2017) CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2025 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.23945 of 2017)
Date of Decision: 2025-02-11