Search Results for "wrong rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "wrong rule"

5024 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5024 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

27 Apr 2020

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MPLADS Circular Allowing Funds for Private Hospitals in COVID-19 Relief. Circular dated April 8, 2020, permitting MPLADS funds for private hospitals is intra vires the MPLAD Scheme and not arbitrary.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioner, a legal practitioner, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging a circular dated April 8, 2020, issued by the Joint Secretary (MP...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Release of Accused Under Section 169 CrPC in NDPS Case — Special Prosecutor Acted Without Investigating Officer's Consent. The court held that the investigating officer's consent is mandatory for an application under Section 169 CrPC, and the Special Prosecutor cannot independently decide to release accused when there is evidence of possession of psychotropic substances like Tramadol without license.

4 Mar 2019

The Union of India, through the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29 October 2018 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Employee in Excess Payment Recovery Case — Recovery from Pension Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension quashed as no opportunity of hearing was given before ordering recovery.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer Statistics by the respondent no.5 on 19.10.1994. He was granted higher p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Decree to Correct Name of Judgment Debtor and Sets Aside Attachment of Third Party's Property. Decree holder permitted to amend arbitration award and decree to substitute 'M/s. Sarju International' with 'M/s. Sarju International Ltd.' as the correct judgment debtor; attachment of bank account and property belonging to the third party applicant set aside as they were not the judgment debtor.

9 Sep 2005

The judgment concerns two chamber summonses arising out of an execution application. The first chamber summons was taken out by the decree holder, M/s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition for Non-Compliance with Court Order in Property Dispute. Court holds that willful disobedience of an interim order must be proved beyond reasonable doubt and mere filing of a caveat does not constitute contempt.

1 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Anita Purushottam Hiranandani, filed a criminal contempt petition against her brother-in-law, Respondent No.1 Dwarka Revchand Hiranand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.

20 Feb 2015

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent factual findings by lower courts upheld as appellants failed to establish any legal error in dismissal of suit for injunction and adverse possession claim under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

6 Jan 2026

The dispute originated from a Regular Civil Suit filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction against the State of Gujarat and its officers to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Contempt of Courts Act Provisions as Unconstitutional — Petitioner's Allegations of Violation of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights Rejected. Court holds that Sections 2(c), 12, 14 and 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are not unconstitutional and that the contempt proceedings against the petitioner are not liable to be quashed.

4 May 2017

The petitioner, Satish Mahadeorao Uke, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a dec...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)