Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "consent arbitral award"

937 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 937 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Awards in Chit Fund Dispute — Petitioner Failed to Prove Patent Illegality or Violation of Public Policy. Court Upheld Arbitrator's Award of Principal and Interest for Default in Payment of Chit Fund Installments Under Chit Funds Act, 1982.

18 Jul 2019

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Petitions Under Section 11 of Arbitration Act for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Agreements. Petitions Filed by Financial Services Company Against Borrowers Under Loan and Security Agreements Containing Clause 21 Arbitration Clause.

30 Sep 2022

The petitions were filed by Caterpillar Financial Services India Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, against variou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Exchange Dispute — No Violation of Right to Legal Representation Found. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate any denial of opportunity to engage a lawyer before the Appellate Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Feb 2005

The case involves an appeal against an order of a Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Amendment to Arbitration Petition Under Section 34. Addition of Grounds Within Limitation Period Does Not Amount to Fresh Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

11 Jan 2017

The appellant, Messrs. Raghuvir Cotton Ginning & Pressing Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Amendment in Arbitration Petition Under Section 34. Amendment to Add Additional Grounds Within Limitation Does Not Amount to Filing Fresh Application.

11 Jan 2017

The case involves an appeal filed by Messrs. Raghuvir Cotton Ginning & Pressing Pvt. Ltd. (the appellant) under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Violation of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Evidence. The court held that the arbitrator's failure to consider the contractor's evidence and counter-claim, and the award being unreasoned, rendered the award patently illegal and in conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

24 Sep 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Pancham International, a contractor, was appointed by the Union of India (Respondent No.1) for supply of bush shirts, pants, and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commodity Dispute — Upholds Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the award did not suffer from patent illegality or contravention of public policy, and the arbitration agreement was validly formed.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by IFIN Commodities Ltd. (the petitioner) challenging an arbitral award passed by a sole arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Leave and Licence Dispute — Interest on Security Deposit for Delay Period Not Payable as Liquidated Damages Without Proof of Loss. The court modified the award to limit interest to the actual delay period at the contractual rate, holding that the arbitrator's award of interest for the entire period including post-possession was contrary to the agreement and Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator in a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Tripartite Agreement Dispute Over Warehousing Charges — Handwritten Insertion of 'Per Month' Not Binding Without Consent. The court upheld the arbitrator's finding that the handwritten insertion was not part of the agreement and that the award was not contrary to public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Jan 2014

The dispute arose from a tripartite agreement dated 18 May 2004 between Essar Oils Limited (Petitioner), Central Warehousing Corporation (Respondent N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Cause of Action at Ratnagiri Confers Jurisdiction on District Court, Not High Court. Filing of Section 11 application before High Court does not confer jurisdiction under Section 42 for Section 34 petition; the court where cause of action arises under Section 2(e) has exclusive jurisdiction.

29 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Premlaxmi And Co., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the Bombay High Cou...

64 65 66 67 68

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)