APPEAL NO.662 OF 1995
16 Dec 2005The appeal arises from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 18 January 1996 in Arbitration Petition No.184 of...
Search Results for "absurd allegations"
659 result(s) found
Found 659 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Division Bench Examines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts under MRTU Act Amidst Conflict with Supreme Court Precedents. The Court Considers Whether the Decision in GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Abhay Raj Jain Stands Impliedly Overruled by Nandram v. Garware Polyester Limited and Rakesh Kumar Verma v. HDFC Bank Ltd. for Determining Cause of Action in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints.
3 Nov 2025This judgment deals with a batch of appeals and writ petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay involving a common question of territoria...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Bombay Determines Territorial Jurisdiction of Labour Courts Under MRTU Act for Employees Outside Maharashtra. The Court considers whether the principle that situs of employee determines jurisdiction (GlaxoSmithKline) is overruled by subsequent Supreme Court rulings.
3 Nov 2025The High Court of Bombay heard a batch of matters, including Appeal No.585 of 2009 and several writ petitions, involving employees and trade unions fr...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Developers and MCGM from Recognizing TDR Transfer Agreements in Alleged Fraud by Society Members. Co-operative Housing Society Obtains Interim Relief Against Sale of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) Under DRC Dated 7 August 2023 Amidst Allegations of Forgery and Unauthorized Payments.
3 Oct 2025The dispute arose from the acquisition of a portion of the plaintiff co-operative housing society's land by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumba...
- 21
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Interim Injunction in Enforcement of Foreign Judgment Suit; Prima Facie Case Not Established. The Single Judge's Order Granting Injunction Without Recording Findings on Essential Requirements Is Challenged Under Section 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
2 Feb 2012The matter arose from a suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) seeking enforcement of a foreign judgment dated 21 September 2010 from the District...
- 45
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Commercial Appeal, Upholds Arbitral Award in ICT Project Dispute — Termination Found Unlawful. Composite Contract and Direct Nexus Between State and Consortium Rendered Claim Maintainable, and Arbitral Award of Rs.178.98 Crores Not Against Public Policy.
18 Sep 2025The appeal arises from an arbitral award of Rs.178,98,38,525 in favour of respondent No.1, a consortium partner, against the State of Karnataka for wr...
- 23
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence in Gangrape Case: First Conviction Under Section 376E IPC After 2013 Amendment. Trial Court Imposed Capital Punishment for Repeat Offenders in the Shakti Mill Incident, and the High Court Reviewed Procedural Propriety of the Sentence.
25 Nov 2021The judgment under analysis is a confirmation case arising from the brutal gangrape of a young photo journalist at Shakti Mill premises in Mumbai on 2...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under IPC Sections 376(2)(g), 366, 342, 506(2) r/w 120-B. Court Examines Evidence of Prosecutrix, Identification, and Defence of Consent Versus Total Denial Under Section 313 CrPC.
28 Sep 2021The Bombay High Court heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of conviction in Sessions Case No.489 of 2010 decided by the Additiona...
High Court
High Court Examines Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction in SARFAESI Proceedings and Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The judgment addressed whether allegations of non-issuance of Section 13(2) notice permit civil court suit despite Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and reviewed trial court's rejection of bank's application.
23 Apr 2021By way of a civil revision application under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, reviewed an ...
