Search Results for "Rule 222"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Rule 222"

682 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 682 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Assessee's Claim for Section 10B Deduction on Beneficiation of Iron Ore as Manufacturing Activity. The court held that converting raw mined iron ore into Iron Ore Concentrate Fines through beneficiation constitutes 'manufacture' under section 10B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, entitling the assessee to deduction.

9 Dec 2020

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the assessee's claim for deduct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased Were Gratuitous Passengers in Goods Vehicle, Not Covered Under Insurance Policy. The court held that under Section 95 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, an insurance policy for a goods vehicle does not cover passengers carried for hire or reward, and the deceased were not employees of the owner, thus the insurer is not liable.

12 Mar 2010

The case involves two appeals filed by the United India Insurance Co. Ltd. against the award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The accident occu...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Conclusive Circumstantial Evidence and Flawed Investigation. Conviction under Sections 302 and 392 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

9 Aug 2019

The appellant, Snehal Dias, was convicted by the Special Judge, NDPS, Mapusa, for the murder of Naresh Dourado and robbery of his car and other items,...

High Court

WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019

19 Dec 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Control Eviction Suit — Landlord's Bonafide Need for Residential Premises Upheld. Court affirms that the landlord's requirement for the suit flat for his own residence and his family members is reasonable and bonafide under Section 13(1)(g) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging Housing Rates Control Act, 1947.

1 Oct 2005

The petitioner, original defendant, was a monthly tenant of the suit premises, a flat in Mumbai, at a monthly rent of Rs. 450. The respondent, origina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge-Sheet in Tree Preservation Case Due to Non-Cognizable Offence and Lack of Sanction. Proceedings under Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Preservation of Trees Act, 1975 initiated without proper investigation procedure and without sanction as required under Section 21 read with Section 8 of the Act.

20 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Shri Mukesh Laxman Das Talreja, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party's Impleadment in Probate Petition — Only Beneficiaries Under a Will Can Be Impleaded as Parties to a Probate Petition. The Court held that a third party not a beneficiary under a Will has no locus standi to be impleaded in a probate petition under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

3 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Mrs. Pravina Vikrant Ghotge, filed a probate petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to implead a third party as a respondent. The b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.

10 Dec 2025

The Plaintiff, Erle Benedict Pereira, filed a suit seeking a declaration for extra FSI/additional area in respect of his entitlement under a registere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Remand Order in Rent Control Matter. Landlord Held Ineligible for Permission Under Clause 13(3)(vi) of C.P. and Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 Due to Availability of Other Suitable Accommodation.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Purushottam Ramlal Shukla, is the landlord of premises at Dharampeth, Nagpur, comprising two rooms admeasuring 22 ft. x 33 ft. let out...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Rent Control Dispute — Remand Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. Landlord's Application for Permission Under Clause 13(3)(vi) of C.P. and Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 Held Maintainable Despite Earlier Proceedings Under Other Sub-Clauses.

8 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Purushottam Ramlal Shukla, is the landlord of premises at Dharampeth, Nagpur, comprising two rooms admeasuring 22 ft. X 33 ft. let out...

63 64 65 66 67

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)