Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party's Impleadment in Probate Petition — Only Beneficiaries Under a Will Can Be Impleaded as Parties to a Probate Petition. The Court held that a third party not a beneficiary under a Will has no locus standi to be impleaded in a probate petition under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. Pravina Vikrant Ghotge, filed a probate petition in the Bombay High Court seeking to implead a third party as a respondent. The background involves the death of Narayanrao Ramrao Bhave, the ruler of Ramdurg Sansthan, who died intestate on 10 April 1996, leaving behind his daughter (the petitioner) and his wife Ushadevi. Ushadevi died on 10 April 2000. The petitioner applied for succession certificates in respect of their properties. Subsequently, a Will dated 26 March 2000 of Ushadevi was brought to her notice. Respondent no.1 and original respondent no.2 filed a probate petition in respect of that Will. The petitioner sought to implead respondent no.3, who was not a beneficiary under the Will, as a party to the probate proceedings. The legal issue was whether a third party not a beneficiary under a Will can be impleaded as a respondent in a probate petition. The Court analyzed the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, particularly Sections 222, 276, and 283, and held that only persons who are beneficiaries under the Will or who have a direct interest in the estate can be impleaded. A stranger without any right or interest cannot be added as a party. The Court dismissed the petition, holding that the third party had no locus standi to be impleaded.

Headnote

A) Succession Law - Probate Petition - Impleadment of Third Party - Section 222, 276, 283 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 - The question was whether a third party not a beneficiary under a Will can be impleaded as a respondent in a probate petition - The Court held that only persons who are beneficiaries under the Will or who have a direct interest in the estate can be impleaded; a stranger without any right or interest cannot be added as a party - The petition was dismissed as the third party had no locus standi (Paras 2-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a third party who is not a beneficiary under a Will can be impleaded as a party respondent to a probate petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. The third party cannot be impleaded as a respondent in the probate petition.

Law Points

  • Probate petition
  • impleadment of third party
  • beneficiary under Will
  • locus standi
  • Succession Act
  • 1925
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (07) 49

WRIT PETITION NO. 6945 OF 2012

2014-07-03

Smt. R.P. Sondurbaldota

Mr. Rajesh Behere for petitioner, Mr. S.S. Kanetkar for respondent no.3

Mrs. Pravina Vikrant Ghotge

Mr. Vinayak Ramchandra Dindorikar and Late Shri. Shrimant Narayanrao Bhave Charitable Trust

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the impleadment of a third party in a probate petition.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to implead respondent no.3 as a party to the probate petition.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed that respondent no.3 had no interest in the Will and should not be impleaded.

Issues

Whether a third party who is not a beneficiary under a Will can be impleaded as a party respondent to a probate petition.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that respondent no.3 is a stranger to the Will and has no locus standi. Respondent no.3 contended that he has an interest in the estate.

Ratio Decidendi

Only persons who are beneficiaries under a Will or have a direct interest in the estate can be impleaded as parties to a probate petition; a third party without any right or interest cannot be added.

Judgment Excerpts

The question that arises for consideration of the Court, in this petition is whether a third party who is not a beneficiary under a Will, can be impleaded as a party respondent to a probate petition.

Procedural History

Notice was issued on 28 August 2012 with a note that the petition would be heard and disposed of finally at the stage of admission. Respondent no.1 absent despite service; name of respondent no.2 deleted due to death; respondent no.3 appeared to contest.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Succession Act, 1925: 222, 276, 283
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Tower Construction on Agricultural Land Without Consent. Landowners' Rights Under Article 300A of the Constitution Upheld Against State's Unilateral Action.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party's Impleadment in Probate Petition — Only Beneficiaries Under a Will Can Be Impleaded as Parties to a Probate Petition. The Court held that a third party not a beneficiary under a Will has no locus standi to b...