Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 52
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Plaintiff, Erle Benedict Pereira, filed a suit seeking a declaration for extra FSI/additional area in respect of his entitlement under a registered Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 executed between Mr. Alexander Benedict Joseph Pereira (ABJ Pereira) and the predecessor-in-title of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, Erlyn Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. The Plaintiff also filed an Interim Application seeking appointment of a Court Receiver. The Court heard arguments from both sides. The Defendant opposed the application. The Court, after considering the pleadings and submissions, found that the Plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Court Receiver to protect the subject matter of the suit pending final disposal. The Court allowed the Interim Application and appointed a Court Receiver. The decision was based on the balance of convenience and the need to preserve the property in question.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Deed of Conveyance - Interpretation - Extra FSI/Additional Area - The dispute pertains to the entitlement of the Plaintiff to extra FSI/additional area under a registered Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 executed between Mr. Alexander Benedict Joseph Pereira and the predecessor-in-title of the Plaintiff and Defendant Society. The Court considered the prima facie case and balance of convenience for appointment of a Court Receiver. Held that the Plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Court Receiver to protect the subject matter of the suit pending final adjudication (Paras 1-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to appointment of a Court Receiver in respect of the suit property pending disposal of the suit seeking declaration of extra FSI/additional area entitlement under a registered Deed of Conveyance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim Application is allowed. Court Receiver appointed in respect of the suit property.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of Deed of Conveyance
  • Appointment of Court Receiver
  • Interim Relief
  • Balance of Convenience
  • Prima Facie Case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (12) 174

Interim Application No. 6603 of 2025 in Suit No. 300 of 2025

2025-12-10

Milind N. Jadhav, J.

Mr. Karl Tamboly a/w Ms. Anuja Jhunjhunwala & Ms. Pooja Mehta i/by M Mulla Associates, Advocates for Applicant / Plaintiff; Mr. Sean Wassoodew a/w Ms. Ashna Shah & Mr. Abdul Rehman, Advocates for Defendant / Respondent

Erle Benedict Pereira

Erlyn Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit seeking declaration for extra FSI/additional area entitlement under a registered Deed of Conveyance.

Remedy Sought

Appointment of a Court Receiver in respect of the suit property pending disposal of the suit.

Filing Reason

Dispute over entitlement to extra FSI/additional area under the Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994.

Issues

Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to appointment of a Court Receiver pending suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued for appointment of Court Receiver to protect his rights under the Deed of Conveyance. Defendant opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for appointment of a Court Receiver to protect the subject matter of the suit pending final adjudication. Balance of convenience is in favor of the Plaintiff.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr. Tamboly, learned Advocate for Applicant / Plaintiff and Mr. Wassoodew, learned Advocate for Defendant / Respondent. Interim Application is filed by Applicant / Plaintiff. Suit is filed seeking declaration for extra FSI / additional area in respect of Plaintiff's entitlement under the registered Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 executed between Mr. Alexander Benedict Joseph Pereira (ABJ Pereira) and predecessor-in-title of Plaintiff and Defendant Society.

Procedural History

Suit No. 300 of 2025 filed by Plaintiff. Interim Application No. 6603 of 2025 filed for appointment of Court Receiver. Pleadings completed. Heard on 10.12.2025 and allowed.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application for Appointment of Court Receiver in Property Dispute Over Extra FSI Entitlement. Dispute concerns interpretation of Deed of Conveyance dated 27.09.1994 regarding additional area rights.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Case — Reference Filed Within Limitation as Time Spent on Obtaining Certified Copy Excludable Under Section 12(2) of Limitation Act, 1963. Enhancement of Compensa...