Search Results for "Andheri East"

723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's finding of breach of contract and award of damages upheld as not perverse under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, through the General Manager of Western Railway, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award Due to Lack of Valid Arbitration Agreement and Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Petitioner Not a Signatory to Draft Agreement, No Concluded Contract Found.

The petitioner, M/s Alankit Healthcare TPA Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in judicial custody; detaining authority failed to consider less restrictive alternatives under ordinary law, rendering detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Mahesh V. Amesur, cousin of Jeetu Shankarlal Chhapru, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Discharge Voucher. Dispute as to Quantum Under Fire Insurance Policy Referred to Arbitration Under Clause 13 of Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy.

The applicant, MIRC Electronics Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a so...