Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Petitions Seeking to Quash Private Complaint and FIR for Offences Under Sections 354A, 500, 506, 120B IPC. Multiple Accused Challenge the Proceedings as Abuse of Process of Law.
9 Aug 2024...
Search Results for "official misconduct"
727 result(s) found
Found 727 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Commercial Arbitration Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award on Royalty Liability for Earthwork. Liability for Royalty on Ordinary Earth Used in Embankment Held by Arbitral Tribunal to be Borne by Employer, Section 34 Petition Filed Challenging Interpretation of Contract Clauses.
14 Nov 2025The matter involved a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to a majority arbitral award dated 22nd May 2020 arisin...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Bombay Discharges Contempt Rule Against Police Officer for Arrest Despite Anticipatory Bail; Finding Lack of Wilful Disobedience Due to Unclear Communication of Extended Order. Contempt Not Established as Extended Anticipatory Bail Order Was Not Properly Communicated to Officer, Negating Wilful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
14 Jul 2006The matter arose from a suo motu contempt reference made by the District and Sessions Judge, Solapur, against Shri E.N. Sakore, a Police Sub-Inspector...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.
10 May 2013The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...
- 37
High Court
- 38
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Legal Standards for Reservation in Promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Under Article 16(4-A) of the Constitution. The Court Held That There Is No Fixed Yardstick for Quantifiable Data Showing Inadequacy of Representation, and the State Must Collect Data Based on Cadre as the Unit, with Sampling Methods Permissible, While Affirming the Prospective Operation of M. Nagaraj v. Union of India.
28 Jan 2022The judgment arose from a batch of cases challenging reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Article 16(4-A) of the ...
- 816
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Haryana VAT Act Case Due to Jurisdictional Issue and Misapplication of Precedent. High Court Erred in Dismissing Writ Petition on Alternative Remedy Grounds as Appellant Raised Pure Question of Law Under Section 34 of Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Regarding Revisional Authority's Competence.
1 Feb 2023The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissing a civil writ petition filed by the appellant, who challenged the jur...
- 288
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Borrowers' Right to Hearing in RBI Fraud Classification Directions. The Court held that principles of natural justice, specifically audi alteram partem, must be read into the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016 to prevent arbitrariness, as classification entails serious civil consequences under Clauses 8.9.4 and 8.9.5.
27 Mar 2023The civil appeals arose from challenges to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directio...
- 328
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Attempt to Murder and Arms Act Case Based on Concurrent Factual Findings. Intent to Kill Under Section 307 IPC Inferred from Circumstances Including Pointing Pistol and Threat, and Misuse of Licensed Weapon for Illegal Purpose Attracts Section 27 Arms Act, 1959.
26 Nov 2021The dispute arose from an incident on 10 July 1999, where the appellant, a Head Constable in Chandigarh Police, entered the residential office of the ...
- 1059
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in ISRO Drivers Association Recognition Case — Association Formed on Job Description Not a 'Distinct Category' Under Rule 5(c) of CCS (Recognition of Service Associations) Rules, 1993. The Court held that the expression 'distinct category' must be determined by the concerned Ministry/Department based on functional, administrative and organizational set up, and not merely on job description.
10 Aug 2020The Government of India and others appealed against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh which had directed the appe...
- 205
