Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1878 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1878 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Tenant Defendants in Possession Suit, Sets Aside Injunction. Court holds that tenants in possession cannot be injuncted without a decree for possession, and a suit for injunction simpliciter is maintainable against a landlord.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order of the Learned Single Judge dated 6th September 2021. The Appellant in Appeal No.551 of 2019...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Suit for Specific Performance — Appellant's Alienation of Property During Pendency of Suit Held Contumacious. Doctrine of Lis Pendens Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Applied to Protect Plaintiffs' Rights.

The appeal arose from an order appointing a Receiver over a property in a suit for specific performance and permanent injunction. The plaintiffs (resp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Despite Delay in Filing Application Under Section 48(1) of Maharashtra Stamp Act. Limitation Bars Remedy Not Right, State Cannot Retain Double Stamp Duty on Same Transaction.

The petitioner, Nanji Dana Patel, entered into a development agreement with Keshav Krishanlal Syngal on 3 March 2014, paying stamp duty of Rs.78,65,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Decree-Holder Against Judgment-Debtors. Court Rejects Objections Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Including Public Policy, Non-Arbitrability, Fraud, Limitation, and Res Judicata.

The applicant, Integrated Sales Services Limited, a Hong Kong-based company, obtained a foreign arbitral award dated 28 March 2010 from an Internation...