Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1516 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1516 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Interim Measures in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act, Citing Public Interest in Airport Development. Termination of Determinable Contract Not Stayed as Injunction Would Amount to Specific Performance Barred Under Specific Relief Act.

The case arose from a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Remove Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. Relationship Between Arbitrator and Law Firm Representing Party Does Not Automatically Disqualify Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sheetal Maruti Kurundwade, filed a petition under Section 9 and Sections 12(3) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Flat Purchaser Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act for Incomplete Flat Due to Struts. Developer directed to remove struts and complete flat within 12 weeks or pay compensation.

The petitioners, Shahveer Padam Kapadia and another, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Consignment Agent Dispute — MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. Scope of Interference with Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limited to Grounds of Public Policy and Patent Illegality.

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by MMTC Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had upheld the majority arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Limited Scope of Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and Affirms Modification of Interest Rate from 18% to 12% Per Annum.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...