Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Waqf Property Dispute — Status Quo Maintained Pending Final Hearing. Court holds that interim protection is necessary to preserve the subject matter of the suit and prevent irreparable loss to the applicants.

The present matter is an interim application filed in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The applicants, Masjid and Madarsa Gausiya (a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order in Land Area Correction Dispute — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's challenge to area correction based on 2018 report succeeds as Minister failed to consider 2010 report and denied opportunity to cross-examine.

The petitioner, Rolland Stanislaus Britto, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 June 2021 passed by the Minister-Revenue, Maharashtra, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging PMLA Attachment — Section 32A IBC Immunity Overrides Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA. Resolution Plan Approved for Corporate Debtor Shields Assets from Enforcement Directorate's Attachment.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by individuals (Shiv Charan, Pushpalata Bai, and Bharti Agarwal) challenging a provisional attachment or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.

The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Non-Delivery of Shares and Limitation Were Not Perverse or Contrary to Law.

The appellant, M/s Satish K. Narang & Co., an investor, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the ju...