Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturers' Plea for Regularization in Unaided Engineering College — UGC Pay Scales Not Mandatory for Private Unaided Institutions. Petitioners failed to establish employer-employee relationship with State or that college receives government aid, and regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right without sanctioned posts.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, lecturers in various departments at Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institution of Engineering and Technology, Nanded, filed writ petitions seeking regularization of their services and payment in UGC pay scales. They had rendered about 3-5 years of service at the time of filing. The college is an unaided private institution. The petitioners argued that they were entitled to regularization and UGC scales as per government policies. The State and the college opposed, contending that the college is unaided and private, and the State cannot be directed to create posts or absorb employees. The court analyzed the pleadings and found that the petitioners failed to establish any employer-employee relationship with the State or that the college receives government aid. The court held that regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right without sanctioned posts, and UGC pay scales are not mandatory for private unaided institutions. The petitions were dismissed, and all pending civil applications were disposed of.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Regularization - Unaided Private Institution - Petitioners working as lecturers in Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institution of Engineering and Technology, Nanded, sought regularization and UGC pay scales - Court held that the college is an unaided private institution and the State cannot be directed to create posts or absorb employees without sanctioned posts - Petitioners failed to establish employer-employee relationship with the State or that the college receives government aid - Regularization cannot be claimed as a matter of right (Paras 1-10).

B) University Grants Commission - Pay Scales - Applicability to Unaided Institutions - Petitioners sought UGC pay scales - Court held that UGC pay scales are not mandatory for private unaided institutions unless they receive government aid or are bound by specific regulations - No evidence that the college is bound to follow UGC scales (Paras 3-8).

C) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Writ Jurisdiction - Employer-Employee Relationship - Petitioners sought writ against State for regularization - Court held that without establishing employer-employee relationship with the State, no writ can be issued against the State for regularization of services in a private institution (Paras 5-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners, working as lecturers in an unaided private engineering college, are entitled to regularization of their services and UGC pay scales, and whether the State can be directed to create posts and absorb them.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petitions are dismissed. All pending civil applications are disposed of.

Law Points

  • Regularization of service
  • UGC pay scales
  • employer-employee relationship
  • unaided private institution
  • deemed university
  • right to regularization
  • sanctioned posts
  • government aid
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (09) 5

WRIT PETITION NO. 4546 OF 2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6661 OF 2017 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3167 OF 2021; CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8691 OF 2017 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4546 OF 2016; WRIT PETITION NO. 8024 OF 2017; WRIT PETITION NO. 8027 OF 2017

2022-09-20

Mangesh S. Patil, Sandeep V. Marne

Ms. P. S. Talekar, Advocate h/f Talekar and Associates, Advocate for the Petitioners; Shri L. M. Acharya, Special Counsel for the State/Respondent Nos. 1 and 2; Shri Milind M. Joshi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3; Shri Chaitanya V. Dharurkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4

Ganesh Digamber Jambhrunkar and others; Rahul Sandu Ankushe and others; Vaibhav Bapurao Aundhkar

The State of Maharashtra and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking regularization of services and UGC pay scales by lecturers of an unaided private engineering college.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought regularization of their services, all benefits of permanency including deemed date with effect from 01 April 2016, and directions for payment in UGC pay scales.

Filing Reason

Petitioners claimed they were entitled to regularization and UGC pay scales as per government policies, but the college and State failed to regularize them.

Issues

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regularization of their services in an unaided private institution? Whether the petitioners are entitled to UGC pay scales? Whether the State can be directed to create posts and absorb the petitioners?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they have rendered 3-5 years of service and are entitled to regularization and UGC pay scales as per government policies. Respondents (State and college) contended that the college is unaided and private, and the State cannot be directed to create posts or absorb employees without sanctioned posts.

Ratio Decidendi

Regularization of service cannot be claimed as a matter of right in an unaided private institution without sanctioned posts. UGC pay scales are not mandatory for private unaided institutions. No writ can be issued against the State for regularization of services in a private institution without establishing an employer-employee relationship with the State.

Judgment Excerpts

By present petitions, petitioners seek regularization of their services and all benefits of permanency including deemed date with effect from 01 April 2016. The petitioners also seek directions for payment in the pay scales prescribed by the University Grant Commission. They are working as lecturers in various departments/subjects in Shri Guru Govind Singhji Institution of Engineering and Technology, Nanded and had rendered about 3/5 years of service on the date of filing of the petitions.

Procedural History

The petitions were filed in 2016 and 2017. Civil applications were filed subsequently. The court closed the judgment on 16.09.2022 and pronounced it on 20.09.2022.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturers' Plea for Regularization in Unaided Engineering College — UGC Pay Scales Not Mandatory for Private Unaided Institutions. Petitioners failed to establish employer-employee relationship with State or that college...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Bombay Police Act for Non-Compliance with Section 59 — Show-Cause Notice Not Served by Authorized Officer. The court held that the show-cause notice under Section 59 must be issued by an officer auth...