Bombay High Court at Goa Allows PIL Seeking Removal of Bore Wells, Septic Tanks, and Garbage Pits from Calangute-Candolim Beach Stretch — Environmental Violations by Beach Shacks Must Be Addressed to Protect Coastal Ecology. The court directed compliance with earlier undertakings and enforcement of the shack policy to prevent overcrowding and pollution.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Prosecution
  • 107
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This Public Interest Litigation was instituted by Mr. Reuben Franco, a resident of Calangute, Goa, seeking reliefs concerning the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch. The petitioner alleged that the beach was being degraded by the sinking of bore wells, construction of septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits by beach shack operators, and by overcrowding of shacks in violation of the shack policy. The petitioner sought directions to remove these structures, to comply with earlier directions in PILWP No.40/2018 regarding decongestion and placement of beach chairs, to restrict the number of shacks at main entry points as undertaken by the Director of Tourism, to survey the stretch for violations, and to enforce the terms and conditions of the shack policy. The court heard Mr. Rohit Bras De Sa as Amicus Curiae, the Advocate General for the State, and counsel for the Shack Owners Welfare Society and the Goa State Pollution Control Board. The court issued rule and made it returnable immediately with consent. The court examined the submissions and the earlier undertakings, and directed the removal of bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits from the beach stretch. It also directed the respondents to comply with the undertakings given in PILWP No.40/2018 and to enforce the shack policy strictly. The court emphasized the need to protect the coastal environment and ensure that the beach remains clean and decongested for public use.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Environmental Protection - Coastal Beach Management - Removal of Bore Wells, Septic Tanks, and Garbage Pits - The petitioner sought directions to remove bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits from the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch, and to enforce the shack policy to prevent overcrowding and pollution. The court held that such structures are illegal and harmful to the coastal environment, and directed their removal and compliance with earlier undertakings. (Paras 1-3)

B) Environmental Law - Pollution Control - Solid Waste Management - The court noted that the presence of septic tanks and soak pits on the beach violates environmental norms and poses a health hazard. Directions were issued to the Goa State Pollution Control Board and the Village Panchayat to ensure proper waste management and removal of such structures. (Paras 3-5)

C) Coastal Regulation Zone - Beach Shack Policy - Enforcement of Conditions - The court examined the shack policy and found that the Director of Tourism had undertaken to restrict the number of shacks at main entry points. The court directed strict compliance with the policy and the removal of unauthorized structures to decongest the beach. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch is being subjected to environmental degradation due to unauthorized bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, garbage pits, and overcrowding of beach shacks, and whether the respondents should be directed to remove such structures and enforce the shack policy to restore the beach's ecological balance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court issued rule and made it returnable immediately. It directed the removal of bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits from the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch. It also directed compliance with the undertakings in PILWP No.40/2018 and enforcement of the shack policy to restrict the number of shacks at main entry points and ensure the beach is clean and decongested.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Environmental Protection
  • Coastal Regulation Zone
  • Beach Shack Policy
  • Pollution Control
  • Solid Waste Management
  • Groundwater Extraction
  • Septic Tank Prohibition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (06) 150

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2022

2023-06-26

M. S. SONAK, BHARAT P. DESHPANDE

2023:BHC-GOA:1075-DB

Rohit Bras De Sa (Amicus Curiae), Prataprao Naik; D. Pangam (Advocate General), Prashil Arolkar, Sulekha Kamat; Pavithran A.V., Prasad Kholkar; Y.V. Nadkarni, Sanket Kamat

Mr Reuben Franco

Director of Tourism, Government of Goa; The Goa Coastal Zone Management Authority; Village Panchayat Calangute; State of Goa; Goa State Pollution Control Board; Department of Water Resources; Shack Owners Welfare Society Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation seeking environmental protection and enforcement of shack policy on Calangute-Candolim beach stretch.

Remedy Sought

Removal of bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, garbage pits; compliance with earlier directions; restriction of beach shacks; survey of violations; enforcement of shack policy.

Filing Reason

Alleged environmental degradation due to unauthorized structures and overcrowding of beach shacks on the beach stretch.

Previous Decisions

PILWP No.40/2018 concerning decongestion and placement of beach chairs and deck beds on the same stretch.

Issues

Whether the bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits on the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch are illegal and need removal. Whether the respondents should be directed to comply with undertakings in PILWP No.40/2018 and enforce the shack policy.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the beach stretch is being polluted by bore wells, septic tanks, and garbage pits, and that the shack policy is not being enforced, leading to overcrowding. Respondents, including the State and Shack Owners Welfare Society, opposed the petition, but the court found merit in the petitioner's concerns.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the presence of bore wells, septic tanks, soak pits, and garbage pits on a public beach is illegal and environmentally harmful. The shack policy must be strictly enforced to prevent overcrowding and pollution. The court emphasized the need to protect coastal ecology and ensure public access to clean beaches.

Judgment Excerpts

Heard Mr Rohit Bras De Sa, learned Amicus Curiae, Mr D. Pangam, learned Advocate General... This Public Interest Litigation was instituted seeking the following reliefs regarding the Calangute-Candolim beach stretch...

Procedural History

The PIL was filed in 2022. The court heard the parties on 26th June 2023 and issued rule, making it returnable immediately with consent. The court directed removal of illegal structures and enforcement of the shack policy.

Acts & Sections

  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Agreement Held to Be Licence, Not Lease. The Court upheld the concurrent findings of the Competent Authority and Additional Commissioner that ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Partly Allows Accused Persons in Multi-State Investment Fraud FIRs Clubbing and Grants Interim Bail. Clubbing Permitted Only Within Telangana and Maharashtra, While Single FIRs in Other States Not Transferred; Future FIR Clubbing Prayer...