Protecting Consumer Clarity in Pharmaceutical Markets
13 Jun 2024The case involves a dispute over trademark infringement between the plaintiff's "ZITA-MET" and the defendant's "XIGAMET" in the pharmaceutical sector....
Search Results for "trademark registry"
117 result(s) found
Found 117 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Seeking Transfer of Rectification Petitions; Holds Jurisdiction for Rectification Lies with High Court of Appropriate Office. The Court interpreted the definite article 'the' in Sections 47 and 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 to mean the High Court exercising appellate jurisdiction over the relevant Trade Marks Registry, and held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to transfer rectification petitions when the court lacks statutory jurisdiction.
20 Feb 2025The petitioner, a private company, filed C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.199 of 2023 before the Madras High Court against several parties including the 5th respond...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against 'ULTRA TUFF' Cement for Infringing 'ULTRATECH CEMENT' Trademark and Passing Off. The court held that the mark 'ULTRA TUFF' is deceptively similar to the registered trademark 'ULTRATECH CEMENT The Engineer's Choice' under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and restrained the defendants from using the mark.
28 Jun 2011The plaintiff, Ultra Tech Cement Limited, filed a suit alleging that the defendants, Alaknanda Cement Pvt. Ltd. and another, were infringing its regis...
- 100
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.
29 May 2013The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.
2 Aug 2017The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for tra...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.
14 Sep 2016The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviewed Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Cancelling Pharmaceutical Trademark Registration. The Court Examined Whether Rectification Application Was Maintainable Under Section 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Whether IPAB Correctly Applied Deceptive Similarity Test to Cancel OFLOMAC Mark.
15 Feb 2023The dispute concerned pharmaceutical trademarks OFLOMAC and OFRAMAX. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, the petitioner, challenged an order of the Inte...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
10 Sep 2014The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.
20 Jul 2016The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit. Defendant's marks 'Ultraplus Cement', 'Ultra HiTouch', and 'UltraPower' held deceptively similar to registered 'UltraTech' marks under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
28 Apr 2026The plaintiffs, UltraTech Cement Limited and another, filed a commercial IP suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, M/s. Shiv C...
- 99
