Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a leading manufacturer of adhesives and sealants, filed a suit against Poma-Ex Products and others for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off. The plaintiff's well-known product 'FEVIKWIK' is a cyanoacrylate instant adhesive sold in distinctive yellow and blue packaging with specific colour combinations, layout, and a blue ball device. The plaintiff held several trademark registrations for 'FEVIKWIK' and its packaging since 1987, including word marks and label registrations. The defendant adopted the mark 'KWIKHEAL' for an identical product packaged in a similar yellow and blue trade dress, with red lettering and an identical blue ball device. The plaintiff discovered the defendant's application for registration of its label in April 2014 and filed the suit. At the hearing of the notice of motion for interim injunction, the plaintiff deleted other defendants and proceeded only against Poma-Ex Products. The plaintiff argued that 'KWIKHEAL' is deceptively similar to 'FEVIKWIK', and the overall similarity of marks and packaging was likely to confuse consumers, thereby infringing its registered trademarks and copyright. The defendant did not appear to make substantive submissions. The court considered the evidence of sales, promotional expenditure, and registrations, and found that despite a disclaimer on the exclusive use of 'KWIK' in one registration, the overall similarity of the marks and packaging constituted infringement. The court concluded that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, and passing off. The balance of convenience favored the plaintiff, and irreparable injury would result without interim relief. Accordingly, the court was inclined to allow the notice of motion and grant an injunction restraining the defendant from using the impugned mark and packaging. The judgment was reserved on 19 June 2017 and pronounced on 2 August 2017, granting the injunction.

Headnote

A) Trademark Infringement - Deceptive Similarity - Infringement Despite Disclaimer - Trade Marks Act, 1999 - The court considered the similarity between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' for identical goods. Despite a disclaimer for the exclusive use of 'KWIK' in one registration, the overall similarity of the marks, including the arrangement and get-up, was likely to cause confusion. The disclaimer did not disentitle the plaintiff from protection of the mark as a whole, especially since subsequent registrations had no such disclaimer. Held, defendant's use of 'KWIKHEAL' infringed the plaintiff's registered trademark. (Paras not numbered)

B) Trade Dress Infringement - Distinctive Packaging - Imitation of Colour Combination and Get-up - Trade Marks Act, 1999, Sections 2(zb), 29 - The plaintiff's 'FEVIKWIK' products used a unique yellow and blue colour combination with specific layout, font, and a blue ball device. The defendant's packaging was found to be a colourable imitation of this trade dress, copying the overall look and feel, which was distinctive and associated exclusively with the plaintiff. The court found infringement of the packaging registrations. (Paras not numbered)

C) Passing Off - Misrepresentation - Deception of Consumers - Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 27 - The defendant's use of a deceptively similar mark and packaging was likely to mislead the public into believing that the defendant's goods were those of the plaintiff. This misrepresentation amounted to passing off and was causing damage to the plaintiff's substantial goodwill and reputation. (Paras not numbered)

D) Interim Injunction - Prima Facie Case - Balance of Convenience - Specific Relief Act, 1963 - The plaintiff established a strong prima facie case of trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, and passing off. The balance of convenience was in favour of the plaintiff, and irreparable injury would result if the injunction was not granted. The court thus granted interlocutory relief restraining the defendant from using the impugned mark and packaging. (Paras not numbered)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the defendant's use of the trademark 'KWIKHEAL' and its packaging for instant adhesive amounts to infringement of the plaintiff's registered trademarks 'FEVIKWIK' and its distinctive packaging registrations, and passing off

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court was inclined to grant the interim injunction in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) restraining the defendant from using the mark 'KWIKHEAL' and similar packaging. However, the final extract of the operative order is not available in the provided text.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • passing off
  • disclaimer of exclusive use
  • distinctiveness
  • deceptive similarity
  • trade dress
  • interim injunction
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • likelihood of confusion
  • well-known mark
  • registered trademark
  • colourable imitation
  • get-up
  • layout
  • copyright in packaging
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (08) 49

Notice of Motion No.2695 of 2016 in Suit No.653 of 2014

2017-08-02

R.D. Dhanuka, J.

Mr.Hiren Kamod, Ms.Mustafa Safiyuddin, Mr.Sumeet Rane, Mr.Hassan Safiyuddin i/by Legasis Partners for applicant/plaintiff; Mr.B.N. Poojari for defendant

Pidilite Industries Limited

Poma-Ex Products

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Trademark and copyright infringement and passing off action seeking interim injunction

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff seeks injunction restraining defendant from using trademark 'KWIKHEAL' or any similar mark, and from manufacturing, selling, or dealing in impugned products; also for other reliefs

Filing Reason

Defendant allegedly adopted deceptively similar mark and packaging to ride on plaintiff's goodwill in 'FEVIKWIK'

Previous Decisions

Leave granted under clause XIV of Letters Patent for passing off action under Copyright Act, 1957 on 20th October 2016; defendant's application for registration of 'KWIKHEAL' label discovered by plaintiff in April 2014

Issues

Whether defendant's use of 'KWIKHEAL' mark and packaging amounts to infringement of plaintiff's registered trademarks 'FEVIKWIK' and distinctive packaging registrations? Whether defendant's actions constitute passing off?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that FEVIKWIK is a well-known mark with massive sales and advertisement since 1959; defendant's mark KWIKHEAL is deceptively similar; defendant's packaging is a colourable imitation of FEVIKWIK Distinctive Packaging with identical colour combination, layout, font, and blue ball device. Plaintiff submitted that the disclaimer for the exclusive use of 'KWIK' in one registration does not affect the distinctiveness and protection of the FEVIKWIK mark as a whole, and subsequent registrations have no such disclaimer. Plaintiff contended that defendant's use causes likelihood of confusion and amounts to misrepresentation, diluting the plaintiff's goodwill and constituting passing off. Plaintiff relied on the certificate of registration of trade marks, copyright, and chartered accountant's certificate showing substantial sales and promotion expenditure.

Ratio Decidendi

Even if a disclaimer exists for part of a trademark, the mark as a whole is protected, and similarity is assessed based on overall impression. In case of packaging/trade dress infringement, the combination of colours, layout, and get-up if deceptively similar leads to infringement. A plaintiff is entitled to cumulative protection of word marks and trade dress registrations.

Judgment Excerpts

Registration of this trademark shall give no right to the exclusive use of the letters 'KWIK' except as shown in the representation of mark. the defendant has thus infringed the registered trademark of the plaintiff bearing No.465651 and 689062 in class 1 for the trademark 'FEVIKWIK' i.e. 'FEVIKWIK' Trade Mark Registrations and the registrations bearing Nos.1643621 and 1643620 i.e. FEVIKWIK Packaging Trade Mark Registrations respectively.

Procedural History

Suit No.653 of 2014 filed against 16 defendants; plaintiff obtained leave under clause XIV of Letters Patent on 20-10-2016 for passing off action under Copyright Act; Notice of Motion No.2695 of 2016 filed for interim injunction; at hearing, plaintiff deleted defendants 2-16 and proceeded only against defendant no.1 Poma-Ex Products; arguments heard and judgment reserved on 19-06-2017; pronounced on 02-08-2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999:
  • Copyright Act, 1957:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Restrains Defendant from Using Similar Trademark in Instant Adhesive Case. Affirms Likelihood of Confusion Between 'FEVIKWIK' and 'KWIKHEAL' Based on Overall Similarity of Marks and Trade Dress.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses/Allows Petitions in JVPD Scheme Open Space Dispute — MHADA's Authority to Convert Garden Plots to Residential Use under Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Act, 1976 Addressed. Detailed Legal Issues Includ...