Search Results for "structural safety"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Constitutes National Task Force on Safety of Medical Professionals in Suo Motu Case Arising from Rape and Murder of Trainee Doctor. Court Highlights Systemic Failures in Institutional Safety and Directs Formulation of National Protocols.

The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance of the alleged rape and murder of a 31-year-old postgraduate trainee doctor at RG Kar Medical College and H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition Against Demolition of Cessed Building Without Compliance with Section 354 of MMC Act and DCR 33(7) — Held that Municipal Corporation must follow statutory procedure before demolition of dilapidated buildings.

The petitioners, tenants residing in a cessed building known as Martand Prasad Building in Malad (West), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining Construction in Property Dispute Among Family Members. Alleged Breach of Development Agreement and Illegal Construction on Common Property Leads to Status Quo Order.

The dispute arises out of a family arrangement among the Motwane family members regarding a larger property at Khar, Mumbai. On 31st March, 1990, the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Telecom Tower Installations on Cooperative Society Rooftops. Held that telecom towers are not structures requiring consent under Section 79A of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and MCGM circular requiring consent is ultra vires.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by residents and cooperative housing societies challenging the installation of telecom towers on the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...