Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Basic Toilet Facilities in All Court Premises Under Article 21 — Right to Dignity Includes Access to Sanitation. The Court held that the right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to sanitation, and the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.

  • 1100
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions to all States and Union Territories to ensure basic toilet facilities in all courts and tribunals for men, women, transgender persons, and persons with disabilities. The petitioner argued that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to live with dignity, which requires access to sanitation. The Supreme Court examined constitutional provisions (Articles 21, 47, 48A), the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 and Rules, 2020, the Harmonised Guidelines for Universal Accessibility, and reports on judicial infrastructure. The Court noted that many court complexes lack adequate and hygienic toilets, especially for women and transgender persons. The Court directed all High Courts to file affidavits detailing the availability and maintenance of toilets, separate facilities for different user groups, and provision of sanitary napkin dispensers. The Court held that the right to sanitation is a fundamental right under Article 21 and that the State must provide and maintain clean, accessible toilets in all court premises. The Court also emphasized non-discrimination against transgender persons and accessibility for persons with disabilities. The matter was listed for further hearing to review compliance.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Life - Right to Sanitation - Article 21, Article 47, Article 48A of the Constitution of India - The Supreme Court held that the right to live with dignity under Article 21 includes access to clean and hygienic toilet facilities. The State is duty-bound under Articles 47 and 48A to improve public health and protect the environment, which encompasses sanitation in court premises. (Paras 8-10)

B) Transgender Rights - Non-Discrimination - Access to Facilities - Section 3 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019 and Rule 10 of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020 - The Court emphasized that discrimination against transgender persons in access to public facilities, including toilets, is prohibited. Separate washrooms for transgender persons must be provided in court premises. (Paras 8.2-8.3)

C) Accessibility - Persons with Disabilities - Universal Design - Harmonised Guidelines & Standards for Universal Accessibility in India, 2021 - The Court noted that public toilets must be accessible to persons with disabilities, including grab bars, accessible WCs, and unisex accessible toilet rooms. (Para 8.4)

D) Judicial Infrastructure - Sanitation - Duty of High Courts - The Supreme Court directed all High Courts to file affidavits on availability and maintenance of toilets for men, women, transgenders, and persons with disabilities, and to ensure separate facilities for litigants, lawyers, and judicial officers. (Paras 7-7.1)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to access basic toilet facilities in court premises, and whether the State is obligated to provide and maintain such facilities for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court directed all High Courts to file tabular statements on affidavit regarding availability and maintenance of toilets for men, women, transgenders, separate facilities for litigants, lawyers, and judicial officers, and provision of sanitary napkin dispensers. The Court held that the right to sanitation is a fundamental right under Article 21 and the State must ensure clean and hygienic toilets in all court premises. The matter was listed for further hearing.

Law Points

  • Right to life includes right to sanitation
  • State duty to provide public toilets
  • Non-discrimination against transgender persons
  • Accessibility for persons with disabilities
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (SC) (1) 150

Writ Petition (C) No. 538 of 2023

2025-02-17

R. Mahadevan

2025 INSC 75

Rajeeb Kalita

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking directions to ensure basic toilet facilities in all courts and tribunals.

Remedy Sought

Writ of Mandamus directing all States and Union Territories to provide and maintain toilet facilities for men, women, transgender persons, and persons with disabilities in all court premises.

Filing Reason

Lack of basic sanitation facilities in court complexes, violating the right to life with dignity under Article 21.

Issues

Whether the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to access basic toilet facilities in court premises. Whether the State is obligated to provide and maintain separate toilets for men, women, transgender persons, and persons with disabilities in all court complexes.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that Article 21 includes the right to live with dignity, which requires access to sanitation; the State has a duty under Articles 47 and 48A to improve public health and protect the environment; international policies and Swachh Bharat Mission also emphasize public toilets. Respondents (High Courts) filed affidavits providing information on availability and maintenance of toilets as directed by the Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution includes the right to live with dignity, which encompasses access to clean and hygienic toilet facilities. The State is duty-bound under Articles 47 and 48A to improve public health and protect the environment, and must provide and maintain such facilities in all court premises for all genders including transgender persons and persons with disabilities.

Judgment Excerpts

The scope of the fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India includes the right to live with dignity and all the necessities of life, such as, adequate nutrition, clothing, health, etc., and no human being can live with dignity unless there are facilities to maintain basic hygiene. It is just and necessary that clean and hygienic toilets are to be provided not only in the places, such as, markets, train stations, tourist places, near office complexes, or other public areas where there are considerable number of people passing by, but also in the Court complex/ premises, where advocates / litigants/ staff members are working in a large number, otherwise, the right conferred by Article 21 cannot be meaningful.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 32. On 08.05.2023, the Supreme Court directed all High Courts to file tabular statements on affidavit regarding toilet facilities. All High Courts complied and filed affidavits. The Court then heard the matter and passed the present judgment.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21, Article 47, Article 48A
  • Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019: Section 3
  • Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Rules, 2020: Rule 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Prosecution Against Accused in Customs Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Petitioner, a Dubai-based Indian, was prosecuted for alleged smuggling of gold bars without prior sanction under Section 137 of the Customs Ac...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Property Dispute — High Court Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits Based on Document Interpretation. The Court held that the High Court's second remand for commissioner identification was unnecessa...