Search Results for "staff vacancy"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Part-Time Librarian Against Non-Absorption Order. Education Inspector's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Government Resolution and Denial of Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioner, Usha Ashok Kare, was appointed as a part-time permanent librarian in Sheth D.G.T. High School, Girgaon, run by respondent No.2 Gokhale...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition to Absorb Surplus Staff in Educational Institution Staffing Case. Condition Imposed by Deputy Director of Education Held Unlawful as Per Canossa Society Precedent.

The petitioner, Young Boys Educational and Industrial Circle, through its president, filed a writ petition challenging a letter dated 09.04.2015 issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Assistant Teachers in School Termination Dispute — Appointment Not Void Ab Initio Despite Non-Compliance with M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. School Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Upheld as Management Failed to Follow Proper Termination Procedure Under Section 5 of the Act.

The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals filed by Assistant Teachers (Smt. Shobha Karve, Smt. Sharada Sureshrao Deshmukh, and Smt. Asha A. Gavka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Deputy Director's Approval of Teacher Appointments in Private School. Petition Alleges Non-Compliance with Section 5, Rule 9 of MEPS Act and Government Resolution Dated 06.02.2012.

The writ petition challenged the order of Deputy Director of Education confirming the approval of appointments of two Shikshan Sevak teachers in a sch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.

The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...