Search Results for "mechanical rejection"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in Forgery Case Due to Two Closure Reports and Long Incarceration. High Court's Rejection of Bail Set Aside as Mechanical, Emphasizing 'Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception' Under Sections 420, 177, 181, 193, 200, 120B IPC.

The appellant, Jeetendra, was arrested on 5th January 2019 in connection with Crime No. 210/2012 registered at Police Station Chhatripura, Indore for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging BJP Candidate's Victory in Dahisar Assembly Constituency. Allegations of Corrupt Practice Under Section 123(1) of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Fail as Petitioner Fails to Prove Bribery or Undue Influence.

The Petitioner, Vinod Ramchandra Ghosalkar, was the Shiv Sena candidate for the Dahisar Assembly Constituency in the 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Asse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of Contract for Supply of Electricity Meters. Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s Landis+Gyr Limited, a supplier of electricity meters, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misconduct Established. Court held that cancellation of bail requires proof of misuse of liberty or supervening circumstances, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The applicant, a minor victim through her natural guardian, filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 145 CrPC Proceedings in Multi-Party Disputes and Successive Orders. The court held that Section 145 CrPC applies to disputes involving more than two parties and that successive orders are permissible if fresh material shows a new apprehension of breach of peace.

The case involves a group of writ petitions and intervention applications challenging the validity of proceedings under Section 145 of the Code of Cri...