Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Process Under Cooperative Societies Rules — Inclusion of 64 Invalid Voters Quashed. The court held that the inclusion of 25% of voters without proper verification violates the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 and directed reconsideration of objections.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 60
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shriram Mukundrao Korde, a member of Vividh Karyekari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., Tandulwadi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the election process for the society's committee. The petitioner was aggrieved by the order dated 7 January 2015 passed by the Election Officer, Shri S.S. Mali, which partly allowed his objection application dated 5 January 2015 regarding the provisional voters list. The petitioner contended that despite his objections, 64 voters were included in the final voters list published on 8 January 2015, who were not valid voters under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014. The total membership of the society was about 240, and the inclusion of 64 voters constituted approximately 25% of the voters, which could significantly affect the election outcome. The petitioner also argued that the election programme was declared in contravention of the Rules. The court, after hearing the petitioner's counsel and the Assistant Government Pleader, issued notice to the respondents and passed an interim order on 15 January 2015. The court reproduced relevant provisions of the Rules and noted that the Election Officer had not properly considered the objections. The court held that the inclusion of such a large number of allegedly ineligible voters without proper verification was unsustainable. The court directed the Election Officer to reconsider the objections and exclude any voters who are not valid under the Rules. The court also directed that the election process be conducted strictly in accordance with the Rules. The writ petition was allowed in part, and the impugned order was set aside to the extent of the inclusion of the 64 voters. The court further directed that the election schedule be revised if necessary.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Election - Voters List - Inclusion of Ineligible Voters - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 - The petitioner challenged the inclusion of 64 voters in the provisional list, alleging they were not valid voters under the Rules. The court held that the inclusion of such a large chunk (25% of total voters) without proper verification vitiates the election process and directed the Election Officer to reconsider the objections and exclude ineligible voters. (Paras 1-5)

B) Cooperative Societies - Election - Compliance with Statutory Rules - Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 - The court observed that the election programme was declared in contravention of the Rules and that the Election Officer failed to follow the prescribed procedure. The court directed that the election process be conducted strictly in accordance with the Rules. (Paras 4-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the inclusion of 64 voters in the provisional voters list, who are allegedly not valid voters under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014, is sustainable and whether the election programme declared in contravention of the Rules is liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition in part, setting aside the impugned order dated 7.1.2015 to the extent of inclusion of the 64 voters. The Election Officer was directed to reconsider the objections and exclude any voters who are not valid under the Rules. The election process was directed to be conducted strictly in accordance with the Rules, and the election schedule may be revised if necessary.

Law Points

  • Election process under cooperative societies rules
  • validity of voters list
  • inclusion of ineligible voters
  • compliance with statutory rules
  • interim relief in election matters
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (02) 16

Writ Petition No. 545 of 2015

2015-02-05

Ravindra V. Ghuge

Mr. V.D. Salunke for petitioner; Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; Mr. S.B. Ghute for respondent No. 4; Mr. V.D. Sapkal for respondent

Shriram S/o Mukundrao Korde

The State of Maharashtra through the Collector, Latur; The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Latur; The Returning Officer and Co-operative Officer Grade-I; Vividh Karyekari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd., Tandulwadi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the election process and inclusion of ineligible voters in the voters list for a cooperative society election.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought setting aside of the order dated 7.1.2015 partly allowing his objections, and direction to exclude 64 allegedly invalid voters from the voters list, and to conduct election in accordance with the Rules.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's objections to the provisional voters list were partly rejected, resulting in inclusion of 64 voters who are allegedly not valid voters under the Rules, and the election programme was declared in contravention of the Rules.

Previous Decisions

The Election Officer passed an order on 7.1.2015 partly allowing the petitioner's objection application dated 5.1.2015. The final voters list was published on 8.1.2015.

Issues

Whether the inclusion of 64 voters in the voters list, who are allegedly not valid voters under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014, is sustainable? Whether the election programme declared is in contravention of the said Rules?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that the election programme was declared in contravention of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014. Petitioner argued that the part rejection of his objections resulted in inclusion of 64 voters who cannot be valid voters under the Rules, constituting about 25% of the total voters.

Ratio Decidendi

The inclusion of a large number of voters (25% of total) without proper verification and in contravention of the statutory rules vitiates the election process. The Election Officer must strictly comply with the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014 while preparing the voters list and conducting elections.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 7.1.2015 passed by the Election Officer Shri S.S.Mali, by which the Objection Application dated 5.1.2015, preferred by the petitioner in regard to the provisional voters' list, has been partly allowed. There are about 240 members of respondent No.4 Society and such 64 members virtually amount to a chunk of 25 per cent of the voters.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed objections on 5.1.2015 to the provisional voters list. The Election Officer passed an order on 7.1.2015 partly allowing the objections. The final voters list was published on 8.1.2015. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on 15.1.2015 and issued notice. The final judgment was delivered on 5.2.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Election Process Under Cooperative Societies Rules — Inclusion of 64 Invalid Voters Quashed. The court held that the inclusion of 25% of voters without proper verification violates the Maharashtra ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition Without Notice Under Section 354 of MMC Act. Municipal Corporation Directed to Restore Possession and Follow Due Process Before Demolition of Alleged Unauthorised Structures.