Search Results for "measurement and valuation"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM Appeal in Property Tax Assessment Case — Land Under Construction Held Assessable as 'Land' Under Section 154 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Small Causes Court erred in holding that land under construction cannot be assessed until building is complete.

The Bombay High Court allowed the appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) against the judgment of the Small Causes Court at...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioners Against Union of India and NHAI -- Challenge to Land Acquisition Under National Highways Act, 1956 Fails -- Section 94 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 Not Applicable

The petitioners, owners of galas in Godown L1, challenged NHAI's acquisition of part of the godown for the Vadodara Mumbai Expressway under the Nation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.25,000 per Hectare Based on Sale Instances and Potential for Development. Claim for Separate Compensation for Trees Rejected for Lack of Evidence.

The appellant, Santosh s/o Tukaram Banmare, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.362 admeasuring 2.10 H.R. at Mouza Jamb, Tahsil Samud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at Rs.25,000 per Hectare Based on Comparable Sale Instance. Claimant Failed to Prove Higher Market Value Despite Claim of Rs.50,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Anand Tukaram Banmare, was the owner of agricultural land bearing Survey No.362 admeasuring 2.12 H.R. at Mouza Jamb, Tahsil Samudrapur,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Arbitration Case. Court upholds arbitral award allowing contractor's claims for hidden expenses and interest, rejecting challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Irrigation Department, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Reference for Compensation for Mining Lease Rights in Land Acquisition. Mining Lessee Not Entitled to Separate Compensation for Loss of Mining Rights Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioner, Pravinkumar Gosalia, was a mining lessee of certain lands in Quitol Village, Quepem Taluka, Goa. His father had obtained a mining leas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that arbitrators are not bound to give reasons for each item of claim and that the award is not liable to be set aside for non-speaking nature under the Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appellant, Board of Trustees of Port of Mormugao, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a contract dated 12/10/1985...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Encroachment and Title. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

The case involves two cross suits between Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde (appellant) and Anna Bhau Lone (respondent) concerning a property admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Court finds no substantial question of law as appellant failed to prove title and respondent established adverse possession.

The case involves two cross suits between the appellant, Chandrakant Ramchandra Godhvinde, and the respondent, Anna Bhau Lone, concerning a property a...