Search Results for "finished goods"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "finished goods"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

13 Nov 2025

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Del...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

24 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Tendu Leaves Contractors Association for Exemption from TCS under Section 206C(1A) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Contractors engaged in trading of forest produce are not liable to tax collection at source as they are not 'buyers' under the provision.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Gondia Beedi Leaves Contractors Association, representing contractors of Tendu leaves (a forest produce), filed a writ petition before...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in MVAT Classification Dispute — Multi Function Printers Held Classifiable as Automatic Data Processing Machines Under Entry 84.71. The Court ruled that multi function printers with copying, printing, scanning, and faxing capabilities are classifiable as automatic data processing machines or units thereof under Entry 84.71 of the VAT Notification, not as laser jet printers or under residual entry.

20 Dec 2018

The appellant, Ricoh India Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an appeal under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Amendment to Section 10(3) of KVAT Act, 2005 — Restriction on Input Tax Credit for Inter-State Purchases Upheld. The court held that the amendment is a valid legislative measure to prevent tax evasion and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

29 Mar 2016

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies, including Sonal Apparel Private Limited and Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Priv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case for Technical Drawings of Flash Lights. Court holds that copyright subsists in technical drawings under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and that reproduction in a three-dimensional form constitutes infringement.

15 Sep 2014

The plaintiff, Photoquip India Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Delhi Photo Store and Sunlight Industries, alleging that the defen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against CESTAT Predeposit Order in Central Excise Valuation Dispute. The Court held that the Tribunal must consider prima facie case, balance of convenience, and financial hardship while deciding waiver of predeposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

1 Mar 2012

The appellant, Hyva (India) Private Limited, is engaged in body building on motor vehicle chassis supplied by Tata Motors Limited. Tata Motors clears ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Revisional Authority's Order Granting Rebate to Merchant Exporter. Rebate Claim Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 Is Independent of Manufacturer's Bogus Cenvat Credit.

28 Jun 2011

The Union of India filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the revisional authority under Section 35EE of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Brand Rate Drawback Claims for Tea Exports. Confirms revocation of brand rate letters and recovery of drawback amounts with interest due to failure to prove actual duty payment.

6 Oct 2010

The petitioners, Hindustan Lever Limited and its shareholder, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an orde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Reference on Capital Goods Credit Eligibility Under Rule 57Q of Central Excise Act, 1944. Material handling equipment not used in manufacture or process does not qualify for capital goods credit.

13 Oct 2005

The judgment concerns two reference applications filed by the Revenue under the Central Excise Act, 1944, arising from an order of the Customs Excise ...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)