Karnataka High Court Considers Appeal Against Acquittal in Defamation Case; Open Postcards Sent to Bank Manager Not Proved to be Read by Third Parties Despite Handwriting Expert Evidence.
11 Nov 2020...
Search Results for "disputed correspondence"
1157 result(s) found
Found 1157 result(s)
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Shareholder's Appeal Against Admission of CIRP for Corporate Debtor Under Section 9 IBC. Pre-Existing Dispute Not Established as Dispute Raised After Demand Notice and Lacking Evidence.
1 Jan 2024The present appeal was filed by Surendra Sancheti, a shareholder of Altius Digital Private Limited (Corporate Debtor), under Section 61 of the Insolve...
- 145
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Consignment Agent Dispute — MMTC Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd. Scope of Interference with Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limited to Grounds of Public Policy and Patent Illegality.
18 Feb 2019The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by MMTC Ltd. against the judgment of the Bombay High Court which had upheld the majority arbitral a...
- 335
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Arbitral Award in Film Distribution Agreement Dispute. Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arises from termination of agreement over alleged plagiarism and failure to deliver a film.
11 Jul 2018The petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Reliance Media Works Limited (formerly Adlabs Films Ltd.) ag...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Reviews Competence of Execution Court to Entertain Section 47 CPC Objections to International Arbitral Award Allegedly Tainted by Fraud; High Court's Dismissal of Objections Questioned. Public Sector Undertaking Appellant Contended That Award Procured Through Collusion of Own Officers with Decree-Holder Is Void Ab Initio, but Executing Court Found No Established Finding of Fraud.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arose from a Long Term Agreement dated 07.03.2007 between MMTC Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking) and Anglo American Metallurgical Coal...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.
22 Jul 2026The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Summary Suit for Recovery of Debenture and Deposit Amounts — Acknowledgment of Liability Found in Correspondence. Evidentiary Value of Letters as Acknowledgment Under Section 18 of Limitation Act, 1963, Upheld to Extend Limitation Period.
14 Jan 2010The Bombay High Court heard a Summons for Judgment in a summary suit filed by Canara Bank and others, as trustees of Canbank Mutual Fund, a trust unde...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Award Rejecting Salvor's Claims for Idling Charges in Salvage Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that salvor failed to prove breach of contract and damages, and that claims were barred by accord and satisfaction.
11 Jan 2019The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to an arbitral award passed by a three-member tribunal i...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Lease Dispute — Finds Perversity in Force Majeure Finding. Court holds that the Arbitrator's conclusion that the lessee's termination was not under the force majeure clause was perverse, but upholds other findings on delayed approvals and property tax dues.
19 Oct 2020The case arises from a lease deed dated 1st August 2013 between Reliable Spaces Pvt Ltd (the Petitioner/Lessor) and Evonik India Pvt Ltd (the Responde...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
30 Jul 2013The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...
- 111
