Search Results for "balance of convenience"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "balance of convenience"

587 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Shop Purchasers Against Rejection of Interim Injunction in Builder-Buyer Dispute. Agreement for Sale of Shop Premises Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 Creates a Charge on the Property, Entitling Purchaser to Injunction Restraining Builder from Alienating or Creating Third Party Rights.

6 Sep 2016

The appeals arise from a common order dated 28.06.2016 passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, rejecting the Notice of Motion filed by the appellants ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

27 Sep 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workmen's Petitions Challenging Labour Court's Refusal of Interim Relief in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Petitioners Failed to Establish Prima Facie Case of Victimization Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

17 Sep 2016

The judgment pertains to a group of writ petitions filed by workmen (original complainants) against SKF India Ltd and its General Manager (HR), challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Ad-Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Holds That Trial Court Must Consider Documents Prima Facie and That Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act Does Not Substitute Injunction

27 Sep 2016

The appellant, Durga Bearing (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, dated 10 August 2016, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Corporation's Demolition Notice Under Section 55 of MRTP Act — Appellant's Possession Based on Census Certificate and Prior Withdrawal of Notice Under Section 354A of MMC Act Entitled to Interim Protection.

24 Oct 2016

The appellant, Anil Sitaram Dubey, filed an appeal against an order of the City Civil Court, Mumbai, dated 26 September 2016, which refused to grant a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Termination. Court Holds That Termination of Development Agreement by Cooperative Housing Society Was Valid and Appellant Failed to Make Out a Prima Facie Case for Interim Protection Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Aug 2016

The appellant, M/s. Amisha Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the order d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in Property Dispute Over MHADA Land — Interim Relief Granted to Protect Possession Pending Trial. The court found that the plaintiff had a prima facie case based on registered documents, while the defendant failed to show any better title or possession.

24 Aug 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, which granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, M/s Krishn...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Temporary Injunction for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC as the property was in the name of the respondent and no joint ownership was proved.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, Smt. Vishankumari Udaysingh Varma and Smt. Manju Udaysingh Varma, filed First Appeal No.627 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.

1 Jul 2016

The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Passing Off and Copyright Infringement Suit for Lack of Evidence of Prior Use and Reputation. Oral Agreement Claim Fails as Plaintiffs Cannot Establish Exclusive Rights Over 'Puranmal' Mark and Chef Logo.

27 Jul 2016

The plaintiffs, Abhay Agarwal, Ajay Agarwal, and Puranmal Restaurant, a partnership firm based in Dubai, filed a suit against Puranmal Goods Private L...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)