Search Results for "Regular Promotion"

484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Education Officer's Order Directing Seniority Revision and Promotion After Petitioner Already Promoted — Education Officer Lacks Jurisdiction Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules Once Promotion Is Granted.

The petitioner, Girish Suresh Jambhalikar, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 10.07.1995 in a school run by respondent No.3 Management. He posse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Employee Seniority and Promotion. The Court upheld the High Court's direction to consider the employee's seniority from his promotion date in the original authority, finding the State's revisions arbitrary under service rules.

The dispute arose from the seniority and promotion claims of the first respondent, who was appointed as Sub-Engineer in Special Area Development Autho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Zilla Parishad's Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Continuation of Temporarily Promoted Employee. Reversion from temporary promotion to substantive post is not punitive and Industrial Court cannot grant such relief.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Ahmednagar, challenging the judgment of the Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Challenge to Promotion of Deputy Director of Health Services — Seniority and Eligibility Criteria Upheld. The court held that the promotion based on seniority-cum-merit was valid and the petitioner failed to establish any arbitrariness or violation of rules.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Dr. Prakash Nachinolkar and Dr. Ruando E.J. J. De Sa challenging the promotion of Dr. Sanjiv Dalvi a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Government Servant's Petition Challenging Tribunal Order on Promotion Claims. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 1979 rejected due to delay and laches as he approached Tribunal in 1991 after retirement in 1988.

The petitioner, Gopalrao Ambadasrao Borikar, a retired Deputy Collector, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India...