Search Results for "Encroachments Removal"

294 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 294 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Encroachments Removed from Korattur Lake. Authorities Directed to Proceed Against Six Remaining Houses as Related Writ Petition Disposed.

The contempt petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, by R. Saravanan against four respondents: Mangat Ram Sharma (Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Closes Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment After Authorities Confirm Removal. Petitioner sought mandamus against municipal authorities to remove encroachment on road portion; court closed petition as grievance redressed.

The petitioner, N. Sankar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachments for Road Widening — Land Occupied by Assignees of Grama Natham Land, Not Encroachers. The court held that no mandamus can be issued against lawful assignees and that the petitioner already has access via the Housing Board road.

The petitioner, Mrs. Lalitha Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tahsildar (3r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Consideration of Representation in Encroachment Case — Statutory Authority Must Act on Representation Within Three Months. Non-consideration of representation by statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, S. Mani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the District Collec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Writ of Mandamus — Representation Must Be Considered Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, ...