Madras High Court Closes Contempt Petition After Encroachments Removed from Korattur Lake. Authorities Directed to Proceed Against Six Remaining Houses as Related Writ Petition Disposed.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The contempt petition was filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, by R. Saravanan against four respondents: Mangat Ram Sharma (Secretary, PWD), R. Arunmozhi (Executive Engineer, PWD), P.G. Gowrisankar (Section Officer, PWD), and Ravichandran (Thasildar, Ambattur Taluk). The petitioner alleged that the respondents had committed contempt of the order dated 26.04.2024 passed by the Madras High Court in W.P. No.11909 of 2024, which directed removal of encroachments from Korattur lake. During the hearing, the learned Special Government Pleader, Mr. A. Selvendiran, submitted that all encroachments had been removed except six houses, against which a separate writ petition, WP.No.6702 of 2025, had been filed. The court noted that the said writ petition was disposed of on the same day. Recording the submission, the court closed the contempt petition and directed the authorities to proceed with the removal of the remaining six encroachments from Korattur lake. The order was passed by a division bench comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice C. Kumarappan on 27-01-2026.

Headnote

A) Contempt of Court - Compliance with Court Orders - Removal of Encroachments - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 11 - The contempt petition was filed alleging non-compliance of the court's order dated 26.04.2024 in W.P. No.11909 of 2024 directing removal of encroachments from Korattur lake. The Special Government Pleader submitted that all encroachments except six houses had been removed, and the six houses were subject to WP.No.6702 of 2025 which was disposed on the same day. Recording the submission, the court closed the contempt petition and directed authorities to proceed with removal of the remaining encroachments. (Paras 1-2)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents committed contempt of court by failing to comply with the order dated 26.04.2024 in W.P. No.11909 of 2024 regarding removal of encroachments from Korattur lake.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Contempt petition closed. Authorities directed to proceed with removal of remaining six encroachments from Korattur lake.

Law Points

  • Contempt of Courts Act
  • 1971
  • Section 11
  • Compliance with court orders
  • Removal of encroachments
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (01) 210

CONT P No. 2769 of 2024

2026-01-27

S. M. Subramaniam, C. Kumarappan

2026:MHC:400

Mr. N. Jayakumar (for petitioner), Mr. A. Selvendiran (Special Government Pleader for respondents)

R. Saravanan

Mangat Ram Sharma, R. Arunmozhi, P.G. Gowrisankar, Ravichandran

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of court order directing removal of encroachments from Korattur lake.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to punish the respondents for contempt of the order dated 26.04.2024 in W.P. No.11909 of 2024.

Filing Reason

Alleged failure of respondents to remove encroachments from Korattur lake as directed by the court.

Previous Decisions

Order dated 26.04.2024 in W.P. No.11909 of 2024 directing removal of encroachments from Korattur lake.

Issues

Whether the respondents complied with the court order dated 26.04.2024 in W.P. No.11909 of 2024 regarding removal of encroachments from Korattur lake.

Submissions/Arguments

Special Government Pleader submitted that all encroachments except six houses had been removed, and the six houses were subject to WP.No.6702 of 2025 which was disposed on the same day.

Ratio Decidendi

Since the respondents substantially complied with the court order by removing most encroachments, and the remaining six houses were subject to a separate writ petition which was disposed, the contempt petition was closed with a direction to proceed against the remaining encroachments.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Special Government Pleader would submit that all the encroachment in Korattur lake has been removed, except six houses against which WP.No.6702 of 2025 has been filed. Recording the above submission of the learned Special Government Pleader, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

Procedural History

The contempt petition was filed on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter on 27-01-2026 and passed the order closing the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971: Section 11
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Bail in Main Offence Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KPTCL Petition Challenging Enhanced Compensation for Tree Cutting and Diminution of Land Value Under Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. Compensation Must Include Diminution in Market Value of Land Due to High Tension Line, ...