Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachment on Public Land in Writ of Mandamus — Representation Must Be Considered Within Three Months. Statutory Authority Has Duty to Consider Representation; Non-Consideration Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

High Court: Madras High Court
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Muthulakshmi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to remove encroachments (shops) made in Survey No.314 situated at Vembur Village, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul District. The petitioner had given a representation to the official respondents on 19.12.2024 for removal of the alleged encroachments, but the representation was not considered, leading to the filing of the writ petition. The court observed that whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or another, instead of keeping it pending indefinitely. Non-consideration of the representation by the statutory authority would amount to dereliction of duty, and hence the court would be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time. Accordingly, the court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner as well as all other persons who may be interested in the subject property, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The court clarified that it had not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the matter and that it was open to the concerned respondents to consider the same on its own merits. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Duty to Consider Representation - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders, instead of keeping it pending indefinitely. Non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying invocation of extraordinary powers under Article 226. (Paras 4-5)

B) Property Law - Encroachment - Removal of Shops - Representation dated 19.12.2024 - The petitioner sought removal of alleged encroachments (shops) in Survey No.314, Vembur Village. The court directed the respondents to consider the representation and pass orders within three months, without expressing any view on merits. (Paras 2-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representation regarding removal of encroachments and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after giving due opportunity to the petitioner and all interested persons, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Duty of statutory authority to consider representation
  • Non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty
  • Writ of Mandamus lies under Article 226 for non-consideration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 196

W.P.(MD)No.1793 of 2025

2025-01-23

M.S.Ramesh, A.D.Maria Clete

Mr.S.Harish (for petitioner), Mr.S.Shaji Bino (Special Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 4), Mr.S.Deenadhayalan (Standing Counsel for respondent No.5)

1.The District Collector / Monitoring Committee, Dindigul; 2.The Tahsildar, Dindigul; 3.The Assistant Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul; 4.The Block Development Officer, Gujiliamparai Taluk, Dindigul; 5.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Office, Kovilur Village, Dindigul; 6.The Divisional Engineer, Highways Department, Dindigul

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct removal of encroachments.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks direction to respondents to remove encroachment (shops) in Survey No.314, Vembur Village, by considering her representation dated 19.12.2024.

Filing Reason

Non-consideration of the petitioner's representation dated 19.12.2024 for removal of alleged encroachments.

Issues

Whether the respondents are obligated to consider the petitioner's representation regarding removal of encroachments and pass appropriate orders within a stipulated time.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that representation dated 19.12.2024 was not considered by respondents. Respondents did not file counter; matter disposed at admission stage by consent.

Ratio Decidendi

Whenever a representation is made to a statutory authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders; non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty, justifying invocation of extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Judgment Excerpts

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon him to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed representation on 19.12.2024; not considered; filed writ petition on 23.01.2025; disposed at admission stage by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Involving Nominal Sale Deed and Bank's Securitization Proceedings. Civil Court's jurisdiction barred under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 for challenging bank's attachment n...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Disciplinary Order Against Clerk for Destruction of Court File - Interpolation of Order and Lack of Causal Link Found. The court held that the disciplinary authority's finding of guilt was not sustainable as the order to cal...