Search Results for "reference jurisdiction"

14688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates on Maintainability of Civil Suit in Municipal Taxation Matter amid Section 406 Appeal Mechanism. Jurisdictional Dispute over Exemption Claim for Charitable Use under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The case involved a dispute over municipal tax levied on a building owned by a public trust. The trust, Akola Gujrati Samaj, claimed exemption from ta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of State Order Transferring Idol Theft Cases to CBI. Court holds that transfer of investigation without consulting the investigating officer and without court's approval was improper.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against the Madras High Court's judgment dated 30.11.2018, which quashed the State Government's order dated 01.08.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Remand Order by Appellate Authority Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Section 7(8) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Power to Remand; Appellate Authority Must Decide Appeal on Merits.

The petitioner, Dr. Gajanan Vithoba Jain, a former employee of the respondent-management running Shiv Vaibhav College of Education, Wardha, filed an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...