Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

645 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 645 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in ACP Scheme Dispute — Deployment as Radio Telephone Operators Held Not a Promotion. Reorganisation of Posts Without Selection Process Does Not Disentitle Employees to Assured Career Progression Benefits Under Office Memorandum Dated 9.8.1999.

The appellants, Telephone Operators with the Delhi Fire Service (DFS), were deployed as Radio Telephone Operators (RTOs) in a higher pay scale followi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Appointment of Arogya Sevak from OBC and Project Affected Category. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for appointment from OBC and Project Affected Category in accordance with law.

The petitioner, Manisha Namdevrao Chole, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KSAT Order Setting Aside Promotions in Co-operative Audit Department for Violation of Seniority Rules. Promotions made without considering seniority and without following Rule 32 of Karnataka Co-operative Audit Department Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2011 are invalid.

The petitioners, who were Joint Directors of Co-operative Audit in Karnataka, challenged an order dated 16/03/2023 passed by the Karnataka State Admin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Teacher Appointment Case: Inclusion in Additional List Does Not Confer Right to Appointment. The Court held that mere inclusion in an Additional List (Wait List) does not create a right to appointment or a co-relative obligation on the State.

The State of Karnataka appealed against a High Court judgment directing the appointment of the Respondent, Smt. Bharathi S., to the post of Assistant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without hearing affected parties violates natural justice.

The petitioners, eight officers of the Karnataka State Government, were on deputation to various departments and were sought to be absorbed into the K...