Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

2085 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2085 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Non-Compliance with Both Conditions of Section 24(2). The court held that for acquisition to lapse under Section 24(2), both non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession must be established, and the burden lies on the petitioner.

2 Mar 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original owner Amratlal Dharamchand Shah, filed a writ petition on 19.07.2019 seeking a declaration that the acqui...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admitted Arbitration Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute Under National Highways Act, 1956. The appeals involved challenge to a common order that set aside an additional arbitral award enhancing compensation to Rs.650 per sq.mtr with 10% statutory easement rights under Section 33(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Apr 2025

These ten arbitration appeals arose from land acquisition compensation disputes under the National Highways Act, 1956. The appellants were landowners ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Enhanced for Agricultural Land. Court held that deduction of 50% for development cost from market value of acquired land was unjustified without evidence of development potential, and that the Reference Court erred in not granting statutory benefits under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Yashwant Changu Bhagat, was the original claimant in a land acquisition matter. His agricultural land in Nandgaon, Taluka Panvel, Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications Due to Non-Consideration of Comparable Sale Instances. Court Remands Matters to Reference Court for Fresh Determination of Market Value Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

31 Mar 2017

The case involves multiple civil revision applications filed by landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Impleadment of Claimants in Land Acquisition Reference — Claimants' Right to Compensation Upheld Despite Non-Impleadment of Original Landowner. Court holds that impleaded claimants are necessary parties and their right to compensation cannot be defeated by subsequent sale deed.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Machindra Santaram Kutwad, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Reference Court (Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur) in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Notification under Section 20(4) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Court Holds No Additional Hearing Required After Considering Objections; Acquisition Proceedings Challenge Not Concluded.

3 Jul 2012

The petitioners, owners of Gat No. 264 in Village Varsoli, Pune, challenged two actions by the State and Lonavala Municipal Council. The adjoining Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Land Acquisition Reference on Limitation Grounds. Notice Under Section 12(2) Served on 27.10.2003, Reference Filed on 9.12.2003 Held Within Time Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Oct 2010

The petitioners, nine individuals whose lands were acquired for the construction of the Urdhav Pravara right canal, challenged the order of the Specia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application for Enhanced Compensation — Land Acquisition Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Limitation Provisions. The court held that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was within limitation and the rejection without hearing violated natural justice.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of Balwant Kannav, challenged the order dated 31.03.1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, reject...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses NHAI Appeal in Land Acquisition Arbitration — Arbitrator's Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that Section 34 petition under Arbitration Act cannot be treated as an appeal on merits and interference is warranted only if award is patently illegal or perverse.

23 Nov 2024

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

56 57 58 59 60

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)