Search Results for "ownership period"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "ownership period"

3116 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3116 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

20 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Title Suit Over Land Ownership Due to Insufficient Proof of Title. Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Ownership Over Suit Land Despite Claims Based on Oral and Decreed Partitions, Leading to Upholding of Trial Court's Dismissal.

7 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a title suit filed in 1967 by Banaras Sah, acting for himself and as legal guardian of his six minor sons, against Krishna...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Karnataka High Court Order Setting Aside Rejection of Plaint in Res Judicata Case. The Court held that the subsequent suit for declaration of title was barred by res judicata and Order II Rule 2 CPC as the issue of title had been finally decided in earlier litigation.

8 Dec 2021

The dispute pertains to 11 acres 16 guntas of agricultural land in Talaghattapura Village, Bangalore. The appellants (Lankappa and others) claimed tit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC in Mortgage Dispute Between Flat Purchasers and Bank. The court held that a civil suit seeking declaration that a mortgage is not valid and for specific performance of an agreement to purchase flats is not barred under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, as the reliefs are outside the jurisdiction of the DRT.

1 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court which had allowed notices of motion filed by Axis Bank Ltd. (r...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Adverse Possession Dispute Over 70-Year-Old Land Title Conflict. The Court held that the appellant had perfected title by adverse possession despite not being the true owner, based on continuous possession from 1963 to 1981 as shown in revenue records.

26 Sep 2019

The dispute originated from a 1942 purchase of suit properties by Krishnamurthy S. Setlur (KS) through his general power of attorney, H.R. Narayana Iy...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Punjab Village Common Lands Act Case — Land Described as 'Shamilat Patti' Not Used for Common Purpose Excluded from 'Shamilat Deh' Definition. The court held that the absence of a comma in the statutory definition was a mistake and that 'shamilat' must be read with 'patti' and other terms, excluding land not used for common purposes.

4 Mar 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Patram against the Gram Panchayat Katwar and others, setting aside the judgments of the High Court of Pu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Decree for Deficit Court Fee Recovery. Appellants' suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed for failure to pay proper court fee on market value of property.

18 Sep 2025

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of an immovable property. The trial cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

4 Jan 2023

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Appellant's Possession of Suit Property Protected Against State and Electricity Board. Court holds that revenue entries and electricity connection do not confer title, and that the Appellant's long-standing possession and construction of a flour mill in 1985 established possessory rights sufficient for injunction against interference without due process.

13 Mar 2023

The Appellant, Tulshiram S/o Jayaji Hajare, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, against the judgment and decree of the 2...

54 55 56 57 58

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)