Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Attachment Orders Under PMLA — Enforcement Directorate's Provisional Attachment Orders Set Aside for Lack of Proper Service and Non-Compliance with Section 5(1) of PMLA

The judgment concerns six criminal writ petitions filed by various individuals and companies challenging provisional attachment orders passed by the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rape FIR in Social Media Dating Case — Consensual Relationship Not Rape. Section 64 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 does not apply where sexual intercourse was based on a false promise of marriage but the promise was not the sole basis for consent.

The petitioner, Mr. Sampras Anthony, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint as Abuse of Process in Counter-Blast to Earlier Complaint. The court held that a complaint filed as a counter-blast to an earlier complaint is an abuse of process of law under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, who are accused in Regular Complaint Criminal Case No.14/2004 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kelapur, filed an ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Defamation Proceedings Against Club Office Bearers for Lack of Specific Allegations. Complaint under Section 500 IPC fails to disclose essential ingredients of defamation as no specific imputation made by each accused.

The petitioners, who were office bearers and members of the General Committee of The Bangalore Club, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes LAO's Apportionment Order in Highway Acquisition — Directs Reference to Civil Court Under Section 19C(4) of Maharashtra Highways Act, 1955. Dispute over compensation apportionment between partnership firm and its individual partners requires adjudication by civil court, not LAO.

The petitioners, Pravin Girish Chamaria and Nishit Bechar Patel, along with respondents 4 and 5 (Dilip Prabhakar Kudalkar and Jagdish Shashikumar Raje...