Search Results for "single scheme"

4461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Multiple Commercial Appeals Involving Interim Applications in Arbitration Petitions. Appellants Challenged Orders in Commercial Arbitration Petitions Against a Partnership Firm and Its Partners.

These matters are commercial appeals filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The appeals arise out ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Widow's Claim in Coal Mines Pension Scheme Dispute Despite Jurisdictional Dismissal. Court Holds Pension as Property Right and Directs Disbursement of Lump Sum Under Para 15(1)(b) and 15(2) of Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998, Adjusting Earlier Refund.

The dispute involved a widow's claim for pensionary benefits under the Coal Mines Pension Scheme, 1998 following her husband's death. The husband, Ram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals Against Land Acquisition for Sir M. Visveswaraya Layout; Upholds Single Judge's Order. The appeals challenged acquisition notifications under Sections 17(1) and 19(1) of the BDA Act, 1976, alleging arbitrary exclusion and violation of constitutional rights.

This matter concerns four writ appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging a common order dated June 6, 2006, of ...