High Court of Judicature at Bombay Heard Multiple Commercial Appeals Involving Interim Applications in Arbitration Petitions. Appellants Challenged Orders in Commercial Arbitration Petitions Against a Partnership Firm and Its Partners.

Case Note & Summary

These matters are commercial appeals filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The appeals arise out of commercial arbitration petitions. The appellants are various individuals and partnership firms, including Mahendra Devilal Jain, M/s. Malpani Transport Co. and its partners, Devichand Ambalal Jain, Rajubai Vithoba More and another, Bharatkumar Mohanlal Shah, Manibai Champalal Jain and another, Kanchanbai Futarmal Jain, Amritlal Versi Malde and another, Jayshree Murlidhar Dhuri and others, and Chandrakant Sahadev Bagwe and another. The common respondents are M/s. National (India) Contractors and Engineers, a partnership firm, and its partners Riyaz Usmangani Khatri and Faruk Usmangani Khatri. The relief sought and the nature of the underlying disputes are not set out in the provided text. The court's analysis, findings, and operative directions are not included in the extract; only the cause title and case numbers are available. Therefore, no legal issues, arguments, precedents, or holdings can be summarised from the material. The factual background consists only of the appellate framework against orders in commercial arbitration petitions. The procedural history consists solely of the filing and listing of these commercial appeals with interim applications before the High Court, uploaded on 20 April 2021. No prior decisions or subsequent orders are mentioned. The absence of a substantive judgment means that no ratio decidendi, obiter dicta, or judicial reasoning can be extracted. The document appears to be a compilation of multiple appeals that may have been heard together, but no consolidation order or hearing details are provided. All substantive details concerning facts, legal issues, arguments, court analysis, and final decision remain unavailable from the text. Accordingly, this summary is limited to the case caption information, which identifies the court, the nature of proceedings as commercial appeals with interim applications arising from commercial arbitration petitions, and the parties involved. No further factual or legal description is possible based on the given extract.

Issue of Consideration