Search Results for "Maharashtra Public Records Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Public Records Act"

3645 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3645 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Order of Divisional Commissioner Recognizing Leader of Opposition. Petition Filed by Elected Corporator Contends That His Earlier Recognition as Leader of Opposition Was Arbitrarily Revoked in Favor of Another Corporator Under Section 191AA of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

31 Aug 2017

The petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by an elected Corporator of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Payment of Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Directs Payment Upon Furnishing Bank Guarantee Despite Pending Appeal by Acquiring Body.

14 Feb 2014

The petitioners, owners of land acquired for the Neera Deoghar Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, sought a writ of mandamus directing the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award — Petitioners Fail to Establish Entitlement to Higher Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the Reference Court's findings on market value based on evidence cannot be interfered with in writ jurisdiction unless perverse.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a writ petition filed by seven individuals (petitioners) against the State of Goa, the Land Acquisition Officer, and eight private r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

26 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Convicts Directors for Default in Filing Statement of Affairs Under Section 454(5) of Companies Act, 1956 — Failure to Submit Statement Despite Repeated Court Orders and Notices Constitutes Offence Without Reasonable Excuse.

1 Oct 2025

The Official Liquidator of M/s. Geeta Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. filed a complaint under Section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 against four accused...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Second Appeals in Part, Remands Suits for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Entitlement to Interest in Recovery Suits by Small Scale Industrial Unit against State Corporation. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to properly consider the applicable articles of the Limitation Act and the entitlement to interest under the Interest Act.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Dattatray s/o Shankarrao Borgaonkar, proprietor of Shree Industries, a small scale industrial unit, filed three suits (Special Civil Su...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Election Petition No. 1 of 2009 Concerning Rejection of Nomination Paper. The core issue is whether non-mention of the constituency in the nomination form constitutes a defect of substantial character under Sections 33(1) and 36(2)(b) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioner filed his nomination for the Mumbai North Central Parliamentary Constituency on 9 April 2009. The Returning Officer accepted the nomina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Land Designation for Timber Industry Under Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners, Landowners, Served Purchase Notices and Contended That No Acquisition Steps Were Taken Within Six Months, While Pune Municipal Corporation Asserted Proposal Was Submitted Before Notices.

29 Apr 2005

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.

5 Jan 2024

The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Independent Arbitrator in Perkins Eastman v. HSCC Dispute — Clause 24 Arbitration Mechanism Invalid Due to Lack of Impartiality. The Court held that a person ineligible to act as arbitrator cannot appoint an arbitrator, relying on TRF Limited v. Energo Engineering Projects Limited.

29 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court considered an application under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the App...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)