WRIT PETITION NO. 5539 OF 2017
5 Feb 2019The petitioner, M/s. Veekaylal Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the Bombay High Court...
Search Results for "reserved area"
4760 result(s) found
Found 4760 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition of Structure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Held That Demolition Without Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) Is Illegal. The Court directed restoration of the demolished structure and compensation for loss caused by the illegal demolition.
21 Mar 2018The petitioners, Anil Banarasidas Jindal (since deceased, through legal heirs) and Narayan Appasaheb Chalge, filed a writ petition challenging the dem...
- 133
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...
- 156
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.
11 Jul 2014The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Civil Judge Selection Process for Lack of Locus Standi. Petitioners who failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in preliminary examination cannot challenge selection against reserved quota under Karnataka Judicial Services (Recruitment) Rules 2004.
4 Jan 2017The petitioners, three practicing advocates, applied for the post of Civil Judges pursuant to a notification dated 01.02.2016 issued by the High Court...
- 174
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Inordinate Delay in Granting Permission to Change Land Use from Railway Reservation to Amenities Under DC Regulations. Held that the Corporation's failure to decide the application within a reasonable time amounts to arbitrary exercise of power and violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
13 Mar 2014The petitioners, Wadhwa Residency Private Limited and Mr. Manohar M. Chhabria, owned a large plot of land in Vikhroli, Mumbai, which was designated as...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision of Amenity Space Computation by Adjusting DP Road Area in Development Proposal. The court held that the area reserved for Development Plan roads, being a public amenity, can be adjusted towards the amenity space required under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Development Control Regulations.
29 Oct 2015The petitioners, Runwal Homes Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Subodh Runwal, owned a plot of land in Nahur, Bhandup (West), Mumbai, which was affected by Developmen...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.
30 Apr 2025This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respo...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.
24 Jan 2020The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Land Acquisition Appeal for Enhanced Compensation — Market Value Determined Based on Comparable Sale Deeds and Capitalization Method. The court upheld the Reference Court's valuation of Rs. 10 per square meter, rejecting the appellants' claim for higher compensation and the State's cross-objection for reduction.
30 Nov -0001The case pertains to a land acquisition matter where the appellants, owners of land bearing Survey No. 55/1 at Calvim, Goa, sought enhanced compensati...
- 70
