High Court of Bombay Hears Second Appeal Against Concurrent Decrees Declaring Lapse of Land Reservation. Issues of Lapsing Under Section 127 of MRTP Act and Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 149 Argued.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 75
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This second appeal arose from concurrent judgments and decrees of lower courts declaring that the reservation on the suit property, owned by the respondent-plaintiff, had lapsed effective 1 September 2012. The property was reserved for a primary school under a sanctioned town planning scheme. The plaintiff served a notice under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act), and when the acquiring body—the appellant Municipal Council—failed to take steps to acquire the land, he filed a suit for declaration of lapsing. The trial court and first appellate court both held that due to the lack of any action to acquire the reserved land, the reservation had lapsed. Before the High Court, the appellant contended that the town planning scheme of 1975 was approved and that a revised scheme received final government approval in 2005, coming into effect from 27 June 2005, thereby preventing lapsing. Additionally, the appellant raised a jurisdictional objection under Section 149 of the MRTP Act, arguing that the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The High Court heard submissions from both sides, including the appellant's emphasis on the revised scheme and the jurisdictional bar. The matter involved the interpretation of Section 127 concerning deemed lapsing of reservation and the effect of a subsequent revised scheme, as well as the scope of the Civil Court's jurisdiction under Section 149. The outcome of the appeal, however, is not contained in the available text.

Headnote

A) Town and Country Planning - Lapsing of Reservation - Failure to Acquire - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Section 127 - The suit property was reserved for primary school under the sanctioned town planning scheme; despite notice under Section 127, the acquiring body failed to take steps to acquire the land; consequently, lower courts concurrently declared the reservation deemed lapsed from 1 September 2012; the appellant's contention that the revised scheme approval in 2005 precluded lapsing was rejected. (Paras 1-3)

B) Civil Procedure - Jurisdiction of Civil Courts - Statutory Bar - Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Section 149 - The appellant raised a jurisdictional challenge, asserting that Section 149 of the Act ousts the Civil Court's jurisdiction over matters relating to the town planning scheme; this issue was argued before the High Court in the second appeal. (Paras 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the reservation on the suit property is deemed to have lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, and whether the Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 149 of the said Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • lapsing of reservation
  • deemed lapse
  • Section 127 MRTP Act
  • jurisdictional bar
  • Section 149 MRTP Act
  • concurrent findings
  • town planning scheme
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 99

Second Appeal No. 2061 of 2019 with Civil Application No. 190 of 2019

2025-04-30

Gauri Godse, J.

2025:BHC-AS:22138

Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar, Mr. Mohan N. Devkole, Ms. Smita Samel for Appellant; Dr. Uday Warunjikar, Ms. Sakshi Inamdar, Mr. Hrishikesh Nabar for Respondent No. 1

Ratnagiri Nagar Parishad Thr. The Chief Officer Ratnagiri Municipal Council Ratnagiri

Madhukar Shankar Redij and ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit by landowner seeking declaration that reservation of his property for primary school under the town planning scheme had lapsed due to failure to acquire.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff sought declaration that the reservation on the suit property is deemed to have lapsed from 1 September 2012.

Filing Reason

The appellant/acquiring body failed to take steps to acquire the reserved land as required under Section 127 of the MRTP Act despite notice.

Previous Decisions

Concurrent judgments and decrees by lower courts granting declaration that the reservation had lapsed.

Issues

Whether the reservation on the suit property is deemed to have lapsed under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Whether the Civil Court's jurisdiction is barred under Section 149 of the said Act.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff contended that failure to acquire the land within the statutory period after notice caused the reservation to lapse. Appellant argued that the revised town planning scheme approved in 2005, with effect from 27 June 2005, prevented lapsing. Appellant also argued that the Civil Court's jurisdiction was barred under Section 149 of the MRTP Act.

Judgment Excerpts

This appeal is preferred by defendant no. 3 to challenge the concurrent judgments and decrees granting a declaration that the reservation on the suit property is deemed to have lapsed from 1st September 2012. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Civil Court’s jurisdiction is barred in view of Section 149 of the said Act.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of lapsing of reservation. The trial court decreed the suit. The first appellate court confirmed the decree. Defendant no. 3, the acquiring body, filed this second appeal before the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 127, 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Cases — Upholds Compensation for Death of Pillion Rider and Injuries to Others. Held that insurer is liable to pay compensation as the vehicle was insured and the accide...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Public Interest Litigation Regarding Unspecified Government Action. The Case Involves Impleaded Respondents Including State Officials and Karnataka Public Service Commission.