Search Results for "exceeding jurisdiction"

2703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Notice for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice in Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965 — Notice Issued Without Prior Hearing Violates Section 55A and Principles of Audi Alteram Partem.

The Bombay High Court, in a common judgment, allowed two writ petitions challenging a notice dated January 6, 2017, issued by the Under Secretary to t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Asset Managers in Commercial Paper Recovery Suit Despite Pending SICA Appeal. The court held that Section 22 of SICA does not bar recovery suits where BIFR has declined registration, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issue.

The plaintiffs, Pramerica Asset Managers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed two summary suits against Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. for recovery of Rs. 25 c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for AY 2014-15 Due to Limitation Under Section 149(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Notice issued beyond six-year period from end of assessment year held invalid as escaped income did not involve assets of value exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs.

The petitioner, a major partner of PSY Group engaged in real estate business, challenged a notice dated 27.03.2025 issued under Section 148 of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application by Chartered Accountant Against Condonation of Delay in Companies Act Prosecution. Delay of Over 7 Years in Filing Complaint Under Section 227/233 of Companies Act, 1956 Not Sufficiently Explained, Prosecution Barred by Limitation.

The present revision application was filed by Yogendra Gangawat, a practicing chartered accountant, challenging the order dated 03.09.2013 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...