Search Results for "arbitrary date"

5536 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5536 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Sections 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petition Contended That Reopening Was Barred by Limitation and Without Jurisdiction; Court Examined the First Proviso to Section 147 and the Requirement of Full Disclosure.

The petitioner, a company engaged in software development and providing services to foreign clients, challenged the reopening of its assessment for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Food Safety Authority’s Advisories Allegedly Amending Regulations Without Statutory Power. Validity of Advisory Issued Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, Questioned as Ultra Vires Section 92 of the Act.

A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Vital Nutraceuticals Private Limited and the Indian Drug Manufacturers’ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Pumping Machinery at MIDC Water Treatment Plant. Court holds that disqualification based on alleged non-submission of required documents was arbitrary and contrary to tender conditions.

The petitioner, M/s Yogiraj Powertech Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender process issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 515A of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Barring Civil Suits Against Demolition Orders. Provision held constitutionally valid as it does not oust writ jurisdiction and provides adequate alternative remedy.

The petitioner, Abdul Razzaq Sunesra, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 515A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, inserted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Non-Certification of Annexures to Return of Allotment Under Section 39(5) of Companies Act, 2013 — Default Under Section 39(4) Relates Only to Filing of Return, Not Certification of Annexures.

The petitioners, N.S.J.L Nidhi Ltd and its officers, challenged an order dated October 11, 2023, by which a Learned Adjudicating Officer imposed a pen...