Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Registration Under Maharashtra Sales Tax Act for Works Contract. Condition No. 10 of e-tender for construction of administrative building held ultra vires as it imposes an additional eligibility criterion not mandated by the Maharashtra Public Works Department's Standard Bidding Document.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, M/s. Siddhanath Construction, a proprietorship firm, challenged tender condition no. 10 in an e-tender issued by the Sangola Municipal Council for the construction of an administrative building. Condition no. 10 required bidders to be registered under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 for works contract. The petitioner argued that this condition was ultra vires the Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department, which did not contain such a requirement. The court examined the Standard Bidding Document and found that it only required registration under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 and the Professional Tax Act, 1975, not the Sales Tax Act for works contract. The court held that condition no. 10 was beyond the scope of the governing document and therefore invalid. The court allowed the petition, directing the respondent to delete condition no. 10 and proceed with the tender process without it. The court also noted that the petitioner had already submitted its bid and that the tender process was ongoing.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Judicial Review of Tender Conditions - Ultra Vires Condition - Condition No. 10 of e-tender requiring registration under Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 for works contract - The court held that the condition is ultra vires the Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department, which does not mandate such registration for eligibility. The condition imposes an additional, unwarranted eligibility criterion that is not found in the parent tender document, thereby violating the principle that tender conditions must be within the scope of the governing document. (Paras 1-10)

B) Contract Law - Tender Process - Standard Bidding Document - Scope and Binding Nature - The Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department is the governing document for tenders. Any condition not found therein cannot be imposed by the tendering authority. The court directed the respondent to delete condition no. 10 and proceed with the tender process without it. (Paras 5-10)

C) Taxation - Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Registration for Works Contract - Not a Mandatory Eligibility Criterion for Tenders - The requirement of registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act for works contract is a statutory obligation for tax purposes, but it cannot be used as an additional eligibility condition in a tender process unless specifically provided in the Standard Bidding Document. (Paras 6-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether tender condition no. 10 requiring registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 for works contract is valid and within the scope of the Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition, quashed condition no. 10 of the e-tender, and directed the respondent to proceed with the tender process without that condition.

Law Points

  • Tender condition must be within the scope of the parent tender document
  • cannot impose additional eligibility criteria beyond the Standard Bidding Document
  • Article 226 jurisdiction for judicial review of tender conditions
  • Maharashtra Sales Tax Act registration requirement for works contract not mandatory for tender eligibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (09) 191

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition No. 11111 of 2025

2025-09-17

M. S. Karnik, Sharmila U. Deshmukh

2025:BHC-KOL:663-DB

Mr. Rushabh Seth a/w Mr. Swaroop Karande, Mr. Sanath N. Mr. Tejas Deshpande i/b Lawfort Advocates for the petitioner; Mr. Akshay Patil a/w Mr. Akash Kamble, Ms. Neha Patil, Ms. Krushna Wankhede i/b Vivaka Partners for the respondent no.2; Ms. T.J. Kapre, AGP for the respondent – State

M/s. Siddhanath Construction through its Proprietor Shri. Balasaheb Mahadev Erande

1. The State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Public Works Department, 2. The Chief Officer, Sangola Municipal Council

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a tender condition.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of tender condition no. 10 and direction to proceed with the tender without it.

Filing Reason

Condition no. 10 of the e-tender required registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 for works contract, which was not mandated by the Standard Bidding Document.

Issues

Whether tender condition no. 10 requiring registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956 for works contract is valid and within the scope of the Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that condition no. 10 is ultra vires the Standard Bidding Document, which only requires registration under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 and Professional Tax Act, 1975. Respondent argued that the condition is necessary to ensure compliance with tax laws and is within the discretion of the tendering authority.

Ratio Decidendi

A tender condition that is not found in the governing Standard Bidding Document is ultra vires and cannot be imposed by the tendering authority. The requirement of registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act for works contract, while a statutory obligation, cannot be used as an additional eligibility criterion in a tender process unless specifically provided in the Standard Bidding Document.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the tender condition no.10 of the subject e-tender issued for proposed construction of administrative building of the respondent no.2. We find that condition no.10 is ultra vires the Standard Bidding Document issued by the Public Works Department. The Standard Bidding Document does not mandate registration under the Maharashtra Sales Tax Act for works contract as an eligibility criterion.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Kolhapur, challenging tender condition no. 10. The petition was heard and disposed of on 17 September 2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Maharashtra Sales Tax Act, 1956:
  • Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002:
  • Professional Tax Act, 1975:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Tender Condition Requiring Registration Under Maharashtra Sales Tax Act for Works Contract. Condition No. 10 of e-tender for construction of administrative building held ultra vires as it imposes an addit...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Valid Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Sanction for Prosecution of Public Servants Must Show Application of Mind, Absence...