Madras High Court Disposes of Street Vendors' Challenge to Highway Obstruction Notices, Orders Consideration of Fresh Representations. The Court Directs Authorities to Examine Representations Within Three Days Under Section 28 of Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, and Permits Further Removal Action Thereafter.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Madras High Court disposed of a batch of eight writ petitions filed by street vendors challenging notices issued by the Highways Department under Section 28(2)2 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, for removal of obstructions on the highway. The petitioners, who were selling nursery plants, bed sheets, fruit juice, fast food, and other items from pushcarts and small shops near Shesaiya Road and Jail Corner in Pudukkottai, contended that the notices were arbitrary and illegal. They sought quashing of the notices and a direction to permit them to continue their business. The court observed that the notices were dated 29.06.2026, and the petitioners had filed representations dated 30.07.2026, which was a future date (as the judgment was delivered on 29.07.2026). The court noted the anomaly but proceeded to treat the representations as fresh representations. It held that under Section 28 of the Act, any representation must be considered by the authorities. Accordingly, the court directed the respondents to consider the representations within three working days (by 31.07.2026, 01.08.2026, 02.08.2026) and pass orders on 03.08.2026. It also permitted the respondents to proceed further in accordance with law from 04.08.2026 onwards. The writ petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs. The court effectively balanced the petitioners' right to have their representations examined with the authorities' duty to remove highway obstructions.

Headnote

A) Highways Act - Removal of Obstructions - Representation Requirement - Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, Section 28(2) - The court noted that if a representation is given under the Act, it must be considered. The notice dated 29.06.2026 was impugned, but representations were dated 30.07.2026 (a future date). The court treated representations as fresh and directed consideration within three working days (by 31.07.2026, 01.08.2026, 02.08.2026) with orders to be passed on 03.08.2026. Respondents were permitted to proceed in accordance with law from 04.08.2026. Held that the representation must be examined before further action is taken. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned notices under Section 28(2)2 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 are arbitrary and illegal; and whether the authorities are bound to consider representations submitted by the petitioners before taking further action

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions were disposed of with directions that the representations dated 30.07.2026 be treated as fresh representations and considered within three working days (by 31.07.2026, 01.08.2026, 02.08.2026), with orders to be passed on 03.08.2026; respondents were permitted to proceed in accordance with law from 04.08.2026. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 28 of Tamil Nadu Highways Act
  • 2001 empowers authorities to remove obstructions
  • representation against notice under Section 28(2) must be considered by authorities
  • court can direct consideration of representation
  • principle of natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (07) 182

WP(MD) Nos.21554 to 21561 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD) Nos.16027, 16031, 16036, 16033, 16030, 16029, 16041 &16028 of 2026

2026-07-29

C.V. Karthikeyan, R. Sakthivel

2026:MHC:3149

Mr.G.Mathavan, Mr.S.I.Muthiah

S.Pichaimuthu, P.Krishnakumar, Mariyammal, Seat Mohamed, Lakshmi, Sanjiagandhi, K.Suresh Kannan

The Divisional Engineer (Highways) Construction and Maintenance Office, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District; The Assistant Divisional Engineer, (Highways), Construction and Maintenance Office, Pudukkottai East, Pudukkottai District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 challenging notices issued under Section 28(2)2 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 for removal of obstructions on highways.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of the notices and a direction to permit them to continue their vending activities.

Filing Reason

The petitioners claimed the notices were arbitrary, illegal, and without legal basis, and that their representations were not considered.

Issues

Whether the impugned notices under Section 28(2)2 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001 should be quashed Whether the respondents are bound to consider representations before taking coercive action

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the notices were arbitrary and illegal, and that they had a right to have their representations considered as per the Act.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 28 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001, any representation against a notice for removal of obstruction must be considered by the authorities. The court can direct expeditious consideration of such representation before further coercive action is taken.

Judgment Excerpts

It is contended that the provision of law stipulates that if any representation is given, the same should be considered. Section 28 of the Tamil Nadu Highways Act, provides authority to the respondents to remove any obstruction. We also hold that the said representations dated 30.07.2026 should be considered as representations submitted afresh and direct consideration of the same within 3 working days, namely by 31.07.2026, 01.08.2026 and 02.08.2026. Orders should be passed on that representations on 03.08.2026. The respondents are permitted to proceed further in accordance with law on and from 04.08.2026.

Procedural History

Writ petitions filed on 23.07.2026 challenging notices dated 29.06.2026; representations dated 30.07.2026 were subsequently made; court heard the matter on 29.07.2026 and disposed of the petitions.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Highways Act, 2001: Section 28(2)
  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Co-operative Society's Appeal Against Reinstatement Order in Illegal Appointment Dispute. Division Bench Holds That Irregular Appointments Made in Violation of Rule 149 of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Rules Cannot Be Sust...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Street Vendors' Challenge to Highway Obstruction Notices, Orders Consideration of Fresh Representations. The Court Directs Authorities to Examine Representations Within Three Days Under Section 28 of Tamil Nadu Highways ...