Search Results for "Karnataka Act 1990"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Karnataka Act 1990"

1245 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1245 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition Challenging KAT Order in Land Regularization Case. Court upholds regularization of unauthorized occupation under Section 94 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, finding no error in Tribunal's order.

20 Sep 2017

The State of Karnataka, along with the Deputy Commissioner and Tahsildar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Indi...

High Court

KAHC010044762015_1

7 Mar 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed by GPA Holder Without Authority Declared Void. Court holds that a General Power of Attorney must expressly authorize sale of immovable property and that the burden of proving authority lies on the party relying on the GPA.

30 May 2016

The case involves a regular first appeal filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 24.02.2012 in O.S.No.2405/2010 passed by the XI...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Information Commission Order in RTI Case — Petitioner Not a Third Party Under Section 11 of RTI Act. Personal Information of Public Servant Sought Cannot Be Denied Under Section 8(1)(j) Without Showing Larger Public Interest.

1 Jun 2026

The petitioner, Smt. S. Savithramma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Not Made Within Two Years of Final Declaration. Failure to Comply with Mandatory Time Limit Under Section 11A Results in Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings for Land in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioner, K L Ramesh, claiming to be the owner of land measuring 3 acres 9 guntas in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Ba...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Authorisation — Officer Not Empowered as Deputy Director Under PML Act, 2002. The court held that an officer designated as Deputy Director by internal office order without gazette notification is not competent to issue attachment orders under Section 48 of PMLA, 2002.

3 Jan 2022

The petitioners, including individuals and a company, challenged a provisional attachment order dated 28.09.2021 issued by the Deputy Director, Enforc...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification After 32 Years Due to Laches and Delay. Petitioner's claim for quashing final notification under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 fails as the challenge is highly belated and the land has already been developed and allotted to third parties.

1 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath K., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Service Protection Claims in Caste Invalidation Cases After Supreme Court Overrules Full Bench Decision. Supreme Court in FCI v. Jagdish Balaram Bahira Overrules Arun Sonone, Potentially Denying Protection to Petitioners Whose Scheduled Tribe Certificates Were Invalidated.

17 Jul 2017

The judgment arose from a batch of writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, wherein petitioners sought protection in service a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Guardianship Petition Under Guardians and Wards Act Maintainable Despite Family Courts Act — Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Guardianship of Person Only. The court clarified that the Family Courts Act does not divest the High Court of its jurisdiction under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 for guardianship of the person of a minor.

22 Dec 2005

The petitioner, Girish J. Bobade, filed a guardianship petition under Section 11 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 before the Bombay High Court see...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Seizure Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Recovery of Foreign Marked Gold Bars from Accused Not Established Due to Lack of Independent Panch Witnesses and Contradictions in Evidence.

8 Jan 2020

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Union of India through the Assistant Collector of Customs against an order of acquittal dated 4-10-2001 pa...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)