Search Results for "arbitration and conciliation act 1996"

2279 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2279 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.

The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Interim Order Restraining Non-Compete Beyond Contract Term. Arbitrator erred in treating Joint Venture Company as partnership and enforcing non-compete clause beyond its stipulated duration under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Commercial Arbitration Petition No.25 of 2021 was filed by Elster Instromet B.V. (Instromet) challenging an order dated 09/10/2020 passed by the A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against High Court Order Refusing Termination of Arbitral Tribunal Mandate. Appellant Failed to Demonstrate Bias or Justifiable Doubts Under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, a supplier of paper, entered into a contract with the respondent in 1993. Disputes arose regarding payment and quality of supply. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Unilateral Appointment Clause Not Barred as Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation Notice.

The petitioner, Uttam Energy Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Intermediary Fee Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of success fee under mandate agreement for introduction of investor.

The petitioner, Airex Logistics Express Services P. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act to Order Upholding Majority Arbitral Award. Arbitral Tribunal Had Set Aside Termination of CISP Agreement Due to Insufficient Proof of Corruption and Awarded Compensation.

The appellant, Anheuser Busch Inbev India Limited (formerly SABMiller India Limited), a beer manufacturing and brewing company, appealed under Section...