Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

1001 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1001 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Madras High Court considers writ petitions challenging reclassification of land from Reserve Forest to Kal Medu. Petitioners seek certiorari to quash notice issued by Forest Range Officer and mandamus to rectify the A Register to reflect the land as Reserve Forest.

6 Mar 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Answers Referred Questions on Adequacy of Protection Under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act and Grant of Interim Injunctions. The Court Examined Whether Section 52 TP Act Provides Sufficient Safeguard to Deny Injunction Pendente Lite and the Role of Notice Registration Under Section 18 of the Indian Registration Act.

4 Oct 2016

The appeal arose from an order of the Trial Court rejecting the appellant's application for temporary injunction in a suit for specific performance of...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition and Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — Upholds Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Award Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitration clause was valid and the award was not contrary to public policy, rejecting challenges under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between the legal representatives of M/s. V. G. Quenim (a proprietary concern) and Smt. Vilasini Vassudev alias Manohar Gu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench adjudicates the limitation period for recovery of electricity charges under Section 56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on whether dues beyond two years can be recovered when not continuously shown as arrears are reconciled.

12 Mar 2019

The case originated from a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman regarding recovery of electricity dues for a period beyond ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Regularisation of Encroachment on Communidade Land at Reduced Rate — Petitioner's Long-Standing Encroachment Prior to Cut-Off Date Entitled to Regularisation at Rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. Instead of ₹3,600 per sq.m. The Court held that the rate of ₹3,600 per sq.m. was arbitrary and not based on any valid criteria, and directed regularisation at the rate of ₹1,500 per sq.m. as per the Government Resolution dated 30.08.2004.

12 Mar 2020

The Petitioner, Mrs. Martha Luis, filed a writ petition challenging the determination of a rate of ₹3,600 per square metre levied upon her for regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Public Sector Refinery Owner's Challenge to Construction Permissions in Security Prohibited Zone. Grant of Commencement Certificate for Residential Building Within 500 Meters of Category 'A' Vital Installation Found Contrary to Official Secrets Act, 1923, DCR, and Circulars Issued by Ministry of Home Affairs.

25 Apr 2019

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a government company operating a refinery at Mahul in Mumbai, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court ch...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

48 49 50 51 52

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)